2014
DOI: 10.1016/j.prevetmed.2014.01.008
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A spatial risk assessment of bighorn sheep extirpation by grazing domestic sheep on public lands

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
21
0

Year Published

2014
2014
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 23 publications
(22 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
0
21
0
Order By: Relevance
“…State and federal natural resource agencies have widely instituted policies to prevent pathogen spillover by encouraging or requiring spatial separation between wild sheep and domestic sheep and goats (Western Association of Fish and Wildife Agencies Wild Sheep Working Group , Bureau of Land Management 2016). Federal and state policies are informed by models, such as the USDA Forest Service's Bighorn Sheep Risk of Contact Tool (Woolever et al ), which incorporate bighorn sheep space use, habitat preferences, foray probabilities, and demographics (Clifford et al , Cahn et al , Carpenter et al , O'Brien et al ) to identify geographic locations with high risk of domestic‐wild sheep contact. These models allow comparison of proposed management alternatives and assessment of population‐level consequences for bighorn sheep.…”
Section: Management Of Pneumonia In Bighorn Sheepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…State and federal natural resource agencies have widely instituted policies to prevent pathogen spillover by encouraging or requiring spatial separation between wild sheep and domestic sheep and goats (Western Association of Fish and Wildife Agencies Wild Sheep Working Group , Bureau of Land Management 2016). Federal and state policies are informed by models, such as the USDA Forest Service's Bighorn Sheep Risk of Contact Tool (Woolever et al ), which incorporate bighorn sheep space use, habitat preferences, foray probabilities, and demographics (Clifford et al , Cahn et al , Carpenter et al , O'Brien et al ) to identify geographic locations with high risk of domestic‐wild sheep contact. These models allow comparison of proposed management alternatives and assessment of population‐level consequences for bighorn sheep.…”
Section: Management Of Pneumonia In Bighorn Sheepmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Schommer and Woolever (2008),Wehausen et al (2011), mathematical models inClifford et al (2009), Cahn et al (2011), and Carpenter et al (2014, and additional data inShannon et al (2014) andSells et al (2015).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Managing to minimize disease transmission from domesticated animals to wild sheep impinges on the fundamental right of private landowners in North America to determine how they manage livestock on their own land. Avoiding grazing management conflicts on public lands might be easier to accomplish but still requires careful coordination between agricultural and wildlife interests (Carpenter et al ).…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%