1997
DOI: 10.1109/70.611315
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A spatial impedance controller for robotic manipulation

Abstract: Abstract-Mechanical impedance is the dynamic generalization of stiffness, and determines interactive behavior by definition. Although the argument for explicitly controlling impedance is strong, impedance control has had only a modest impact on robotic manipulator control practice. This is due in part to the fact that it is difficult to select suitable impedances given tasks. A spatial impedance controller is presented that simplifies impedance selection. Impedance is characterized using "spatially affine" fam… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
38
0

Year Published

1999
1999
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
5
2
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 75 publications
(50 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
38
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If we denote then the total contact wrench is (4) By the control law (1), the motion of the rigid body is given by (5) To maintain contact [13], the reciprocal condition requires Substituting (5) into this and solving for , we have (6) Substituting this result back into (5) yields the following equation for constrained motion:…”
Section: A Constrained Rigid Body Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…If we denote then the total contact wrench is (4) By the control law (1), the motion of the rigid body is given by (5) To maintain contact [13], the reciprocal condition requires Substituting (5) into this and solving for , we have (6) Substituting this result back into (5) yields the following equation for constrained motion:…”
Section: A Constrained Rigid Body Motionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Asada [4] used a similar optimization procedure for the design of an accommodation neural Manuscript network rather than an accommodation matrix. More recently, Fasse and Broenink [5] and Marcelo et al [6] provided synthesis procedures based on spatial intuitive reasoning. None of these approaches, however, ensures that the admittance selected will, in fact, be reliable for a specified range of friction coefficients and part misalignments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Caccavale and Natale investigated the rotational part of the stiffness based on different orientation representations [9], [10]. Spatial stiffness controllers including a coupling stiffness term between translation and rotation were proposed in the works of Fasse and Zhang [11]- [13]. Stramigioli analyzed the power flow for these springs when the rest length 1 and the stiffness values are subject to changes [14].…”
Section: Cartesian Impedance Behaviorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One simple, but effective, possibility to implement an impedance behavior for joint limit avoidance is to use another potential function V l (θ) in superposition with (10), (12) or (11). Let θ i denote the i th element of θ and θ i,min and θ i,max its minimum and maximum value.…”
Section: E Redundancy Treatmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This section presents a non-trivial example to illustrate the utility of the framework for analysing spatially complex interaction controllers.`Spatial compliance control' (Fasse and Broenink 1997) is a Euclidean-geometric method for controlling the mechanical compliance of a robotic end-e ector. Unlike well-known compliance control methods this method does not use generalized coordinates, so it cannot be analysed using conventional methods.…”
Section: Example: Spatial Compliance Controlmentioning
confidence: 99%