2016
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2016.2577712
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Sparse-Based Approach for DOA Estimation and Array Calibration in Uniform Linear Array

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1

Citation Types

0
57
0
1

Year Published

2017
2017
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(58 citation statements)
references
References 29 publications
0
57
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Besides, we assume that A is unambiguous, i.e., the steering vectors {a(θ i )} N i=1 are linearly independent for any set of distinct {θ i } N i=1 . As described in [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]43], it may reasonably consider that there are remarkable negative correlation between the coupling strength and the inter-element spacing, and the cross talk effects can be neglected if the distance between two sensors is larger than several times the length of the minimum inter-element spacing d I . By assuming that the minimum inter-element spacing of two sensors without mutual coupling to be Qd I , the generalized MCM can be approximated by…”
Section: Signal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Besides, we assume that A is unambiguous, i.e., the steering vectors {a(θ i )} N i=1 are linearly independent for any set of distinct {θ i } N i=1 . As described in [27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]43], it may reasonably consider that there are remarkable negative correlation between the coupling strength and the inter-element spacing, and the cross talk effects can be neglected if the distance between two sensors is larger than several times the length of the minimum inter-element spacing d I . By assuming that the minimum inter-element spacing of two sensors without mutual coupling to be Qd I , the generalized MCM can be approximated by…”
Section: Signal Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the mutual coupling effects of the nested array cannot be ignored at least as physical sensors in the inner ULA are deployed relatively close [25][26][27][28][29][30][31][32][33][34][35][36][37][38]. In [39], the super nested array in the context of the second-order statistics is designed to significantly mitigate the cross talk between sensors while preserving all advantages of the standard nested arrays, by increase the inter-element spacing of the inner ULA to maintain the coarray but alleviate the adverse electromagnetic effects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…An ℓ 1 -SVDlike method under unknown MC for ULA has been proposed in [9], which takes advantage of the banded symmetric Toeplitz structure of MCM, but this method sacrifices the array aperture so that some array output data is not being used. The authors in [10] studied a joint sparse recovery of DOAs and array perturbation, in which the perturbation matrix is estimated by solving a sparse matrix completion problem. Inspired by the method in [5], an effective block sparse representation model is considered for DOA estimation in the presence of unknown MC for ULA by [11].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are plenty of papers talking about mutual coupling effects from different points of view [17]. For example, many mutual coupling correction techniques have been presented in different applications such as direction-of-arrival (DOA) estimation [18][19][20][21][22], adaptive beamforming [23][24][25], antenna array manifold repairment [21,22,26] and static array pattern synthesis [7,12,[27][28][29][30][31]. Due to the significance of the mutual coupling, incorporating the mutual coupling into the pattern synthesis should be very useful.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%