2005
DOI: 10.12927/cjnl.2005.17620
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Span of Control Tool for Clinical Managers

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
35
0

Year Published

2008
2008
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 21 publications
(35 citation statements)
references
References 6 publications
0
35
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Managers with wider spans of control generally have less opportunity to develop relationships with individual staff (Cathcart et al, 2004). Therefore, when examining leadership and supervision effectiveness in ILTC, consideration should be given to the number of persons who report to each supervisor to allow for the development of effective employeesupervisor relationships (Simons, 2005;Morash, Brintnell, & Rodger, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Managers with wider spans of control generally have less opportunity to develop relationships with individual staff (Cathcart et al, 2004). Therefore, when examining leadership and supervision effectiveness in ILTC, consideration should be given to the number of persons who report to each supervisor to allow for the development of effective employeesupervisor relationships (Simons, 2005;Morash, Brintnell, & Rodger, 2005).…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, we defined SOC ‘as the control of managers based on the number, skill, stability and diversity of staff; the complexity of the unit(s); and the budget and diversity of the programme for which the manager is responsible’ (Morash et al . , p. 90). We proposed that FLM personal characteristics and their SOC would have an effect on manager job and unit performance outcomes.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 95%
“… ‡ Adapted from Ouchi and Dowling (1974), § Morash et al. (2005), ¶ House and Miner (1969), **Pabst (1993). …”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Multiple variables were used to operationalize budgetary responsibility, programme diversity, complexity of material management, and characteristics of staff. A field study demonstrated that the tool adequately reflected variation among managers in one hospital (Morash et al. 2005).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation