1990
DOI: 10.1016/0169-7552(90)90007-f
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A space priority queuing mechanism for multiplexing ATM channels

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0

Year Published

1992
1992
2010
2010

Publication Types

Select...
5
1
1

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 66 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
16
0
Order By: Relevance
“…High priority packets continue to access the buffer until it is full, at which point arriving high priority packets will also be discarded despite the presence of low priority packets in the buffer. Classical PBS schemes have a static threshold and have been studied in [6,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], for example. In order to improve the overall buffer utilization and responsiveness to changing traffic condition, dynamic threshold PBS schemes have been proposed (see e.g.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…High priority packets continue to access the buffer until it is full, at which point arriving high priority packets will also be discarded despite the presence of low priority packets in the buffer. Classical PBS schemes have a static threshold and have been studied in [6,[8][9][10][11][12][13][14][15], for example. In order to improve the overall buffer utilization and responsiveness to changing traffic condition, dynamic threshold PBS schemes have been proposed (see e.g.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is consistent with ATM cells but it is clearly a modeling simplification for other networks. Such a mechanism has been proposed for ATM networks [18]. We further assume that the low priority packets are scheduled before high priority packets (recall that the priority level is based on the access).…”
Section: A Real Example With Large State Spacementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Section 4 is devoted to the analysis of a real problem: the loss rates of a finite buffer with batch arrivals and modulation, Head of Line service discipline and Pushout buffer management. Such systems have been proposed for ATM networks [18]. The example here is only slightly simplified to focus on the algorithmic aspects.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Their result shows that the two mean waiting times are subject to a linear restriction. Furthermore, Hebuterne and Gravey [6] have evaluated the loss probabilities of a similar system assuming a Poisson arrival process, a deterministic service time and the replacement strategy FIFO. Their solution is not applicable to a general service time distribution.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%