2021
DOI: 10.48550/arxiv.2111.03699
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A space of goals: the cognitive geometry of informationally bounded agents

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1
1

Relationship

0
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 3 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…There are numerous analogies to be explored with respect to porting conceptual tools from relativity to study scale-free cognition. The use of cognitive geometry and infodesics [ 219 ] ties naturally to general relativity. Other examples include the following: Gravitational memory (permanent distortions of spacetime by gravitational waves [ 220 ]) to link the structure of action spaces to past experience; Inertia in terms of resilience to stress (anatomical homeostasis as a kind of inertia against movement in the morphospace and other spaces); Acceleration and force in a network space, where every connection in a network could be modeled via a “spring constant” or, even better, an LRC circuit.…”
Section: Implications: a Research Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There are numerous analogies to be explored with respect to porting conceptual tools from relativity to study scale-free cognition. The use of cognitive geometry and infodesics [ 219 ] ties naturally to general relativity. Other examples include the following: Gravitational memory (permanent distortions of spacetime by gravitational waves [ 220 ]) to link the structure of action spaces to past experience; Inertia in terms of resilience to stress (anatomical homeostasis as a kind of inertia against movement in the morphospace and other spaces); Acceleration and force in a network space, where every connection in a network could be modeled via a “spring constant” or, even better, an LRC circuit.…”
Section: Implications: a Research Programmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There has been a growing body of research aimed towards understanding, from a geometric perspective, how deep learning methods transform input data into decisions, memories, or actions [HR17, LAG + 20, SPG + 21]. Some studies have investigated how dimensionality reduction techniques can represent the geometry of task domains [SMK11] or the intrinsic geometry of a single agent's task [AVBP21]. However, such studies do not usually incorporate the geometry of the originating domain or task in a substantial way, before applying or investigating the performance of learning algorithms -and even fewer do so for multi-agent systems.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%