2018
DOI: 10.1093/ejil/chy041
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Sophisticated Beast? On the Construction of an ‘Ideal’ Perpetrator in the Opening Statements of International Criminal Trials

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…If the ‘ideal victim’ was an old lady then the ‘ideal offender’ was the figure of ‘a dangerous man coming from far away’ (Christie, 1986: 28), thus couching the figure in notions of masculinity (Cohen, 2018:285). The ‘ideal offender’ is an ‘inhuman human’ (Stolk, 2018: 700) and a ‘monster’ (Rock, 1998) who targets the innocent, weak and vulnerable. There is, then, a mutual dependence between how the victim and their victimiser are discursively framed and interpreted (Holstein and Miller, 1990).…”
Section: Ideal Victims and Ideal Offendersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…If the ‘ideal victim’ was an old lady then the ‘ideal offender’ was the figure of ‘a dangerous man coming from far away’ (Christie, 1986: 28), thus couching the figure in notions of masculinity (Cohen, 2018:285). The ‘ideal offender’ is an ‘inhuman human’ (Stolk, 2018: 700) and a ‘monster’ (Rock, 1998) who targets the innocent, weak and vulnerable. There is, then, a mutual dependence between how the victim and their victimiser are discursively framed and interpreted (Holstein and Miller, 1990).…”
Section: Ideal Victims and Ideal Offendersmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…We are taught to see perpetrators in the courtroom differently and to treat them as such. As Stolk (2018) argues, while international criminal law is based on the idea that defendants are part of the human community, speaking about mass atrocity involves a dimension of “inhumane evil that places the accused outside the realm of humanity” (p. 677). This paradoxical inhumanity has received ample theoretical attention in the international criminal justice literature (Arendt, 2006; Baumeister, 1997; Bikundo, 2014, p. 42; Mohamed, 2015a, p. 1628; 2015b, p. 1157).…”
Section: Esad Landžo: a Remorseful Perpetratormentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This balancing act between the human and inhuman is closely related to the paradox that Duff identified: describing the 'worst crimes' may warrant a radical evil, inhuman perpetrator, but staying true to the principles of criminal law requires a human being that can be held to account. 40 The absence of the 'enemy of all humanity' concept in trial discourse is not coincidental, but a consequence of these two conflicting aims. The paradox that Duff introduces not only reveals the danger of the label, but also the limits of its use.…”
Section: By Way Of Conclusionmentioning
confidence: 99%