2006
DOI: 10.1002/cmr.b.20071
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A solution to the dynamic range problem in MRI using a parallel image acquisition

Abstract: ABSTRACT:A parallel image acquisition system has been developed to solve the dynamic range problem in MRI. The parallel receiver system was tested using 3D large matrix spin echo and gradient echo images. The dynamic range of the receiver system was extended to about 80 dB, which was sufficient for a large-matrix (256 ϫ 256 ϫ 512) 3D gradient echo image acquisition at a voxel resolution of 60 m 3 . Our method can be a simple and efficient technique for solving the dynamic range problem in MRI.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2018
2018

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

3
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 10 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This SNR degradation is caused by elongation of the T 1 that is roughly proportional to 1/3rd power of the resonance frequency (about 1.6 times loss at 9.4T compared with that at 2.35T) and the insufficient receiver dynamic range pointed out in the previous study. 9 Image contrast of the liver As shown in Fig. 2b and 2c, image contrast of the liver is quite different between the 2 magnetic field strengths.…”
Section: Snr Of the Mr Imagesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…This SNR degradation is caused by elongation of the T 1 that is roughly proportional to 1/3rd power of the resonance frequency (about 1.6 times loss at 9.4T compared with that at 2.35T) and the insufficient receiver dynamic range pointed out in the previous study. 9 Image contrast of the liver As shown in Fig. 2b and 2c, image contrast of the liver is quite different between the 2 magnetic field strengths.…”
Section: Snr Of the Mr Imagesmentioning
confidence: 92%
“…Because the gain control range of the AD8331 is about 42 dB in our design, according to Ref. [15], the dynamic range of the receiver may be expected to extend to above 125 dB with the aid of the GS technique.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, with this technique the scan time is increased. Another solution uses multiple receivers with different gains to acquire MR signals in parallel [15]. Obviously, this greatly complicates the hardware structure.…”
Section: Gain Switchingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…4[b], [d]). Figure 5 shows the relative average signal power in the k-space plotted against the wave number of the MR signal of the kumquat, which we call the "k-power plot," [22][23][24] obtained with and without the gain-stepping scan for the analog and digital transceivers.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…20,24 Therefore, although a correct gain setting is indispensable, a 16-bit digital resolution is sufficient for most MR imaging.…”
Section: Receiver Dynamic Rangementioning
confidence: 99%