1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0360-8352(98)00149-1
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A solution method for optimal weight design problem of the gear using genetic algorithms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
5

Citation Types

0
66
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
3
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 104 publications
(66 citation statements)
references
References 1 publication
0
66
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Based on the same constraints, Osman et al [2] deduced some of the gear size ratio expressions in another way, discovering that only three In addition, advanced stochastic methods such as the genetic algorithms (GAs), the simulated annealing algorithms (SAAs) and the particle swarm optimization algorithms (PSOAs) are intensively used in some GTOs mainly because these methods can handle various types of design variables, objectives and constraints easily, requiring no information of functional derivatives. Yokota et al [16] optimized the weight of a gear set with an improved GA. Marcelin [17] proposed a GA combined with a penalty selection method to optimize gear pairs. Mendi et al [18] used a GA with a static penalty function incorporated in the fitness function to minimize the volume of a single-stage gearbox.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…Based on the same constraints, Osman et al [2] deduced some of the gear size ratio expressions in another way, discovering that only three In addition, advanced stochastic methods such as the genetic algorithms (GAs), the simulated annealing algorithms (SAAs) and the particle swarm optimization algorithms (PSOAs) are intensively used in some GTOs mainly because these methods can handle various types of design variables, objectives and constraints easily, requiring no information of functional derivatives. Yokota et al [16] optimized the weight of a gear set with an improved GA. Marcelin [17] proposed a GA combined with a penalty selection method to optimize gear pairs. Mendi et al [18] used a GA with a static penalty function incorporated in the fitness function to minimize the volume of a single-stage gearbox.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The results showed that the PSOA and the SAA were more effective and efficient than the GA. However, numerous trials, especially for inexperienced designers, might have to be performed to appropriately determine several parameters for the advanced stochastic methods used in those studies [16][17][18][19][20][21][22][23] since the efficacies of those methods significantly depend on such parameters. Thus, such a requirement might actually increase the total times for those methods to obtain global optima.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Constraints are center distance, deflection of worm and beam strength of worm gear. Yokota et al [8] formulated an optimal weight design problem of a gear for a constrained bending strength of gear, torsional strength of shafts, and each gear dimension as a nonlinear integer programming (NIP) problem and solved it directly by using an improved GA. The efficiency of the proposed method is confirmed by showing the improvement in weight of gears and space area.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It has been proven that GAs are more successful than the others, especially when large numbers of jobs and machines are considered. Yokota [18] formulated an optimal weight design problem of a gear for a constrained bending strength of gear, torsional strength of shafts and each gear dimension as a nonlinear programming problem, and solved it directly by keeping the nonlinear constraint by using an improved genetic algorithm.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%