2022
DOI: 10.1007/s41066-022-00341-2
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A solution algorithm for finding the best and the worst fuzzy compromise solutions of fuzzy rough linear programming problem with triangular fuzzy rough number coefficients

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(6 citation statements)
references
References 40 publications
0
6
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Sarwar et al [37] developed (a PROMETHEE) technique based on FRNs for selecting suppliers in industrial manufacturing. Upper and lower limits in the FRNs adequately characterize the ambiguity of the entire TFNs and the vagueness of any component containing the modal value, upper and lower bounds [43]. Hussain et al [19] proposed an intuitionistic fuzzy rough TOPSIS approach using Dombi operations.…”
Section: Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sarwar et al [37] developed (a PROMETHEE) technique based on FRNs for selecting suppliers in industrial manufacturing. Upper and lower limits in the FRNs adequately characterize the ambiguity of the entire TFNs and the vagueness of any component containing the modal value, upper and lower bounds [43]. Hussain et al [19] proposed an intuitionistic fuzzy rough TOPSIS approach using Dombi operations.…”
Section: Authorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…(i) (1,2,3,4,5,6,7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18; 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8) and B = (-1,0,1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14,15; 0.2, 0.4, 0.6, 0.8)…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
“…( x ≤  (4,6,8,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21,22,24,28,32)  (4,5,6,7,9,10,11,13,15,16,17,18,19,20,23,28,34)…”
Section: Numerical Examplementioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations