2023
DOI: 10.1016/j.microc.2022.108194
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A soluble-fluorescent surface molecularly imprinted polymer sensor based on combined soluble solid phase-and liquid–liquid-microextraction

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2023
2023
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 32 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…However, this approach frequently led to poor binding kinetics, sluggish mass transfer and partial template removal [ 20 , 21 ]. Surface molecular imprinting technology, which involved creating a thin MIP layer on the surface of supporting materials, had been introduced to address these problems [ 22 , 23 , 24 ]. Surface-imprinted materials had advantages such as more accessible recognition sites, less mass transfer resistance, faster binding kinetics, and higher template removal efficiency [ 25 , 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, this approach frequently led to poor binding kinetics, sluggish mass transfer and partial template removal [ 20 , 21 ]. Surface molecular imprinting technology, which involved creating a thin MIP layer on the surface of supporting materials, had been introduced to address these problems [ 22 , 23 , 24 ]. Surface-imprinted materials had advantages such as more accessible recognition sites, less mass transfer resistance, faster binding kinetics, and higher template removal efficiency [ 25 , 26 , 27 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%