Global to Local: Ecological Land Classification 1996
DOI: 10.1007/978-94-009-1653-1_37
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Soil-Site Evaluation Index of Productivity in Intensively Managed Pinus Radiata (D. Don) Plantations in South Australia

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2006
2006
2015
2015

Publication Types

Select...
4

Relationship

0
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 4 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 8 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Soil rootable depth is shown to be an important factor in most studies (Turvey et al. , 1990; Hollingsworth et al. , 1996; Romanyà & Vallejo, 2004), but while a minimum depth of 60 cm has been suggested for optimum growth of Radiata pine in Atlantic areas of Spain (Sánchez‐Rodríguez et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Soil rootable depth is shown to be an important factor in most studies (Turvey et al. , 1990; Hollingsworth et al. , 1996; Romanyà & Vallejo, 2004), but while a minimum depth of 60 cm has been suggested for optimum growth of Radiata pine in Atlantic areas of Spain (Sánchez‐Rodríguez et al.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The influence of land characteristics on the growth of Radiata pine and on plantation management has been studied: for example, in Chile (Francke et al. , 1988), New Zealand (Hunter & Gibson, 1984) and Australia (Hollingsworth et al. , 1996) where a specific ‘Soil Classification for Pinus radiata ’ has been developed (Turvey et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The range of SI values for the studied stands was similar to that reported for another region in northern Spain (Sánchez et al, 2002). The intensively managed radiata pine plantations of south Australia and the reduced water stress of New Zealand plantations have higher site index than the Spanish plantations studied (Hunter and Gibson, 1984;Hollingsworth et al, 1996). Unexpectedly, the lowest productivity of the plantation studied in northern Spain coincided with the area with highest rainfall.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 74%
“…These national systems vary across jurisdictions in their specific criteria for defining site types, and in their hierarchy of organization, but in general they share a fundamental focus on depicting the variation in topography, substrate and vegetation characteristics across the landscape at a scale that is appropriate for supporting decisions relevant to forestry, wildlife habitat and other ecological services [66]. These systems have proven useful for capturing site-specific differences in forest growth and yield [67][68][69], and our results suggest that ecological land classification systems may also be useful for examining general patterns in the wood quality properties of trees across the landscape.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%