2019
DOI: 10.1080/10350330.2019.1587843
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A sociosemiotic interpretation of cybersecurity in U.S. legislative discourse

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2019
2019
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

0
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 26 publications
(1 citation statement)
references
References 28 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…In its emphasis on defending democracy and securing truth, contemporary cybersecurity has become increasingly 'human centric' (Cheng et al, 2019). While the status of the individual as an object of cybersecurity has been debated in existing scholarship (Carr, 2016;Collier, 2018;Hansen and Nissenbaum, 2009), in this penultimate subsection I argue that cybersecurity's politics of truth have produced a corresponding 'subject of cybersecurity' for whom an 'obligation to know' (Foucault, 2014a: 256;2014b: 93; see also Legg, 2016Legg, , 2019 becomes the basis of secure political subjectivity.…”
Section: The Subject Of Cybersecuritymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In its emphasis on defending democracy and securing truth, contemporary cybersecurity has become increasingly 'human centric' (Cheng et al, 2019). While the status of the individual as an object of cybersecurity has been debated in existing scholarship (Carr, 2016;Collier, 2018;Hansen and Nissenbaum, 2009), in this penultimate subsection I argue that cybersecurity's politics of truth have produced a corresponding 'subject of cybersecurity' for whom an 'obligation to know' (Foucault, 2014a: 256;2014b: 93; see also Legg, 2016Legg, , 2019 becomes the basis of secure political subjectivity.…”
Section: The Subject Of Cybersecuritymentioning
confidence: 99%