2020
DOI: 10.3389/feart.2020.542654
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Socio-Seismology Experiment in Haiti

Abstract: Earthquake risk reduction approaches classically apply a top-down model where scientific information is processed to deliver risk mitigation measures and policies understandable by all, while shielding end-users from the initial, possibly complex, information. Alternative community-based models exist but are rarely applied at a large scale and rely on valuable, but non-scientific, observations and experiences of local populations. In spite of risk reduction efforts based on both approaches, changes in behaviou… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
6
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

1
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 16 publications
(14 citation statements)
references
References 31 publications
0
6
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…However, monitoring of ground motion in urban environments have an important role in the maximization of the spatial coverage of seismic networks, warning systems of local geological hazards, and also for education purposes (e.g. [ 5 7 ]). Urban seismology is a relatively new research field, related to the concept of citizen seismology, and it takes advantage of that seismographic stations can record mobility patterns in populated areas [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, monitoring of ground motion in urban environments have an important role in the maximization of the spatial coverage of seismic networks, warning systems of local geological hazards, and also for education purposes (e.g. [ 5 7 ]). Urban seismology is a relatively new research field, related to the concept of citizen seismology, and it takes advantage of that seismographic stations can record mobility patterns in populated areas [ 4 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…1B), but hard-to-reach rural communities also took a hit, in a context aggravated by the tropical storm that followed the event and chronic insecurity complicating field access from the capital city. In spite of these difficulties, and in the absence of an operational national network of conventional seismic stations, nearby seismological data were readily available during and after the earthquake because of a citizen seismology effort using inexpensive and low-maintenance “Raspberry Shake” (RS) seismic stations hosted by volunteers ( 5 – 7 ) (Fig. 1) [see (8), section 1].…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Limited on-the-ground access has made mapping and identification of surface ruptures challenging. Although many of the citizen science seismometers in the Ayiti-seismes, 2022 network (Calais et al, 2020) were not operational at the time of the earthquake, a single raspberry shake R50D4 provided a record of strong ground motions ~15 km from the earthquake (on the 2012), and the station NQUSE in the American embassy provided an additional in-country record of strong ground motion (Courboulex et al, 2021). The availability of strong ground motion records is in stark contrast to the last major earthquake in Haiti, which occurred on 10 January 2010.…”
Section: Characterisation Of the Eventmentioning
confidence: 99%