A socio‐emotional analysis of technology use by people with intellectual disabilities

Abstract

BackgroundAccess to information and communication technologies (ICTs) is often thought to enhance the lives of people with intellectual disabilities (ID) and is considered an important aspect of digital inclusion. However, inclusion practices often fail to address societal inequalities that lead to and sustain exclusion. The aim of this research was to enhance understandings of the relationships people with ID form with technology by critically analysing the underlying assumptions of inclusion practices.MethodWe employed a post‐qualitative approach to reanalyse previously collected data from face‐to‐face interviews with 10 Australian adults with ID who attended a community literacy programme about their technology use in their daily lives. Two of social theorist Sara Ahmed's key concepts were used to analyse these data: (1) ‘stickiness’ of emotions, where certain (socially dominant) emotions are considered to attach to objects over time (e.g. mobile phone use is normal/good) and (2) ‘fit’ between people and objects, where there is a sense of comfort when objects are designed for people like you – those outside the ‘norm’ experience discomfort and a sense of being ‘othered’ in their interactions with such objects which do not fit them.ResultsOur analysis identified how people with ID often attributed positive feelings to technology even when they had seemingly negative interactions with their devices (e.g. they could not use certain features, caregivers acted as gatekeepers to access). The positive associations were likely the outcome of implicitly held understandings that society highly values technology (Ahmed's stickiness of emotions). Although some participants accessed technology without difficulty, others experienced discomfort due to difficulties using devices that were not designed for them (Ahmed's fit between people and objects). Importantly, some participants had access to technology and the technical skill to use ICTs, but other factors, such as not having many friends, impacted their ability to use their devices in meaningful ways.ConclusionOur analysis suggests that digital inclusion practices focused on providing access to technology may unintentionally harm in ways that are not immediately apparent when working with people with ID. Harms might include further marginalisation or ‘othering’ of people with ID. It is important to recognise that well‐meaning attempts to encourage use of ICTs may be counterproductive if they lead to experiences of marginalisation. To avoid this, inclusion practices could focus beyond access to devices, and the ability to use them, to include considerations of the multiple socio‐emotional effects. What is a good fit is not entirely predeterminable, exploration of the possibilities for what will work well for any individual requires experimentation and creativity, and a careful attention to unintended effects. Beyond this, the development of new technology should consider how to diversify devices that often fail to fit people with disabilities.

‘Now that I am connected this isn't social isolation, this is engaging with people’: Staying connected during the COVID‐19 pandemic

“…Past research has stated that the COVID‐19 pandemic has highlighted the importance of disability service providers to be educated about digital inclusion and to educate and support people with intellectual/developmental disabilities in being able to use technology (Power et al, 2021 ; Scheffer et al, 2021 ). Past research has also stated with digital inclusion we need to be very cautious that we are not excluding people with intellectual/developmental disabilities who may not know how to use technology (Setchell & Torres, 2021 ). Our study findings support past research and demonstrates how effective disability organisations can be in educating and supporting people with intellectual/developmental disabilities in staying digitally included.…”

Testing Two Online Symptom Checkers With Vulnerable Groups: Usability Study to Improve Cognitive Accessibility of eHealth Services

“…Previous research suggests that vulnerable groups, such as older adults and individuals with mild intellectual disabilities, encounter cognitive challenges when using technology [26,27]. Therefore, the development of more accessible eHealth services would enable these groups to access health information more easily [25,28], thereby enhancing their sense of empowerment concerning their health issues.…”

An Inclusive Workplace Approach to Disability through Assistive Technologies: A Systematic Review and Thematic Analysis of the Literature

“…Following the analysis of the HAAT model, we noticed that there are unsolved issues beyond the accessibility of the AT in the workplace, namely, respect for persons, nondiscrimination, and the fight to tackle marginalization [100]. Against the most common advantages and limitations to generalizing the use of AT as a social enterprise [101,102], minor attention in the analyzed literature was found to be more frequently given to the affective domain, and the cultural and institutional contexts.…”