A Socio-Ecological Framework for Cancer Prevention in Low and Middle-Income Countries

Abstract

Cancer incidence and mortality rates continue to rise globally, a trend mostly driven by preventable cancers occurring in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs). There is growing concern that many LMICs are ill-equipped to cope with markedly increased burden of cancer due to lack of comprehensive cancer control programs that incorporate primary, secondary, and tertiary prevention strategies. Notably, few countries have allocated budgets to implement such programs. In this review, we utilize a socio-ecological framework to summarize primary (risk reduction), secondary (early detection), and tertiary (treatment and survivorship) strategies to reduce the cancer burden in these countries across the individual, organizational, community, and policy levels. We highlight strategies that center on promoting health behaviors and reducing cancer risk, including diet, tobacco, alcohol, and vaccine uptake, approaches to promote routine cancer screenings, and policies to support comprehensive cancer treatment. Consistent with goals promulgated by the United Nations General Assembly on Noncommunicable Disease Prevention and Control, our review supports the development and implementation of sustainable national comprehensive cancer control plans in partnership with local communities to enhance cultural relevance and adoption, incorporating strategies across the socio-ecological framework. Such a concerted commitment will be necessary to curtail the rising cancer and chronic disease burden in LMICs.

Breast Cancer Screening in Latin America: The Challenge to Move from Opportunistic to Organized-Systematic Screening

“…In this model, women can receive consistent information about breast cancer screening from many sources and not only their primary care provider. In this way, misbeliefs and misinformation can be more thoroughly addressed 28 .…”

Challenges and Strategies for Improving Access to Cancer Drugs in Malaysia: Summary of Opinions Expressed at the 2nd MACR International Scientific Conference 2022

“… 1 This can be attributed to several factors, including inadequate healthcare infrastructure, low public awareness of cancer prevention and early detection, and exposure to risk factors such as tobacco and pollution. 2 , 3 Fortunately, significant advances in cancer drug development in recent decades have led to a substantial improvement in 5-year survival rates from 50.4% in 1975–1977 to 66.4% in 2006–2012. 4 The prognosis and quality of life of patients with late-stage cancer are also improved by advances in cancer treatment.…”

A Socio-Ecological Approach to A Community-Based Health Promotion Intervention on the U.S.-Mexico Border: Insights and Lessons Learned During the COVID-19 Pandemic

“…In examining community engagement, Caperon et al (2022) proposed the use of the socio-ecological model to develop multilevel solutions and identify systematic roadblocks to tackle barriers to engagement in health initiatives. To date, the socio-ecological model has been widely applied or recommended in studies focusing on violence prevention, health promotion, substance abuse treatment, obesity prevention, and cancer prevention, among others (e.g., Akinyemiju et al 2022; Manuel et al 2017; Quick et al 2017; Sabri et al 2022). The model remains ideal for understanding frameworks for the practice of community engagement through acknowledging the complex relationships between different systems and recognizing that divergent life outcomes are impacted by multiple interconnected factors (e.g., individual or group effects can create ripple or “spillover” effects), which allows practitioners to identify factors that contribute to poor life outcomes, pinpoint leverage points for change, and promote equitable outcomes (CDC 2015).…”