2020
DOI: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2020.137147
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A socio-cultural perspective of sound and location perception: A case study in Aachen, Germany

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 6 publications
(4 citation statements)
references
References 20 publications
0
3
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…In the aspects of participatory sensing, the questionnaire inquiry can be designed to focus on more dimensions of response in addition to soundscape comfort. In addition, we can construct the user’s profile as the complement variable sets containing socio-cultural factors through cluster analysis, which can help to prove the importance of socio-cultural factors in the interpretation of the acoustic environment [ 45 ]. Above all, we can provide more background information in the inquiry and guide the subjects to consider the imperative but overlooked surrounding context, which is essential for exploring the influence of geospatial factors on soundscape quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In the aspects of participatory sensing, the questionnaire inquiry can be designed to focus on more dimensions of response in addition to soundscape comfort. In addition, we can construct the user’s profile as the complement variable sets containing socio-cultural factors through cluster analysis, which can help to prove the importance of socio-cultural factors in the interpretation of the acoustic environment [ 45 ]. Above all, we can provide more background information in the inquiry and guide the subjects to consider the imperative but overlooked surrounding context, which is essential for exploring the influence of geospatial factors on soundscape quality.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This study employed studies of the park soundscapes based on three aspects: objective acoustic environment by equivalent continuous sound pressure level (Shao et al, 2022), subjective acoustic environment, measured by perceived sound intensity (Engel et al, 2016;Kang & Zhang, 2010;Kuwano et al, 1991) and perceived soundscape by the dominance of sound sources (Jeon & Hong., 2015;Liu et al, 2013), and soundscape perceptual attributes (Axelsson et al, 2010;Hong & Jeon, 2013). The subjective well-being measures are based on a single-item Likert scale to measure happiness and satisfaction after park visitation (Yuen et al, 2020).…”
Section: Variables and Measuresmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Subjective measurements of the environment in the selected parks were measured based on a 5-point Likert scale regarding perceived overall sound intensity (Engel et al, 2016;Kang & Zhang, 2010;Kuwano et al, 1991). Mean scores of three and above signify that the selected park is louder than expected, while those below three refer to quieter parks than expected.…”
Section: Subjective Acoustic Environmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…O método de pós-processamento de dados adotado neste estudo foi a utilização de variáveis dummy (variável qualitativa) binária ou dicotômica, com a finalidade de ajudar na quantificação de questões com respostas múltiplas, como, por exemplo, a pergunta sobre motivação de frequentar o parque (questão 5) (ALKHARUSI, 2012;ENGEL et al 2020).…”
Section: Pós Processamento De Dadosunclassified