2005
DOI: 10.1007/11546207_25
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Social Semantics for Multi-agent Systems

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
7
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
6
1
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 15 publications
(7 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
7
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The answer sets of the program, usually defined through (a variant/extension of) the stable model semantics (Gelfond and Lifschitz 1988), are interpreted to the solutions of the problem. This technique has been successfully applied in domains such as planning (Eiter et al 2002;Lifschitz 2002), configuration and verification (Soininen and Niemelä 1999), super-optimisation (Brain et al 2006), diagnosis (Eiter et al 1999), game theory (De Vos and Vermeir 1999) multi-agent systems (Baral and Gelfond 2000;Buccafurri and Gottlob 2002;De Vos and Vermeir 2004;Buccafurri and Caminiti 2005;Cliffe et al 2006), reasoning about biological networks (Grell et al 2006), voting theory (Konczak 2006), policy mechanisms (Mileo and Schaub 2006), generation of phylogenetic trees (Erdem et al 2006), evolution of language (Erdem et al 2003) and game character descriptions (Padovani and Provetti 2004).…”
Section: Answer Set Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The answer sets of the program, usually defined through (a variant/extension of) the stable model semantics (Gelfond and Lifschitz 1988), are interpreted to the solutions of the problem. This technique has been successfully applied in domains such as planning (Eiter et al 2002;Lifschitz 2002), configuration and verification (Soininen and Niemelä 1999), super-optimisation (Brain et al 2006), diagnosis (Eiter et al 1999), game theory (De Vos and Vermeir 1999) multi-agent systems (Baral and Gelfond 2000;Buccafurri and Gottlob 2002;De Vos and Vermeir 2004;Buccafurri and Caminiti 2005;Cliffe et al 2006), reasoning about biological networks (Grell et al 2006), voting theory (Konczak 2006), policy mechanisms (Mileo and Schaub 2006), generation of phylogenetic trees (Erdem et al 2006), evolution of language (Erdem et al 2003) and game character descriptions (Padovani and Provetti 2004).…”
Section: Answer Set Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Here we only present a short flavor of the language AnsP rolog, and the interested reader is referred to [8] for in-depth coverage. AnsP rolog and its extensions have demonstrated [7,9,13,18,24,12,16] that they are a good and useful tool in the domain of multiagent systems.…”
Section: Answer Set Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ASP has been used to tackle a variety of problems, including: planning and diagnosis [18][19][20], modelling and rescheduling of the propulsion system of the NASA Space Shuttle [20], multi-agent systems [21][22][23], Semantic Web and web-related technologies [24,25], superoptimisation [26], reasoning about biological networks [27], voting theory [28] and investigating the evolution of language [29].…”
Section: Answer Set Programmingmentioning
confidence: 99%