A Social Network Analysis of Positive and Negative Gossip in Organizational Life

Abstract

The authors use social network analysis to understand how employees’ propensity to engage in positive and negative gossip is driven by their underlying relationship ties.They find that expressive friendship ties between employees are positively related to engaging in both positive and negative gossip, whereas instrumental workflow ties, which are less trusting than friendship ties, are related solely with positive gossip. The authors also find that structural embeddedness in the friendship network further increases the chance that the pair will engage in negative gossip. Finally, an employee’s total gossiping activity (both positive and negative) is negatively related to supervisors’ evaluations of the employee’s performance, whereas total gossip activity is positively related to peers’ evaluations of the employee’s informal influence.

‘Gossiping’ as a social action in family therapy: The pseudo-absence and pseudo-presence of children

“…Through gossiping the social position of the talked about third party becomes downgraded which by contrast elevates the gossiper to a higher social status (Tholander, 2003). Engaging in gossiping, however, may risk threats to face (Goffman, 1999) as gossiping is a risky social endeavour which is contingent on trust that the recipient will align with the gossiper (Grosser et al, 2010). In practice this means that the person offering the gossip could be perceived by the recipient in a negative way, rather than the object.…”

Disclosing Sexual Assault Within Social Networks: A Mixed‐Method Investigation

“…Thus, this study focuses on two network characteristics associated with the interconnectedness of network members: the degree to which networks are highly interconnected (i.e., network members have relationships with most other members) and the degree to which networks are separated into "cliques," or interconnected subgroups. There are costs and benefits to networks in which members are highly interconnected: they tend to provide higher social support (Walker, Wasserman & Wellman, 1993) but also may promote gossip spread (Grosser, Lopez-Kidwell & Labianca, 2010). If survivors in close-knit networks do not want their broader network to learn about their assault, they might not tell even their closest supporters.…”

Gossip in the workplace and the implications for HR management: a study of gossip and its relationship to employee cynicism

“…In addition, the relationship between two parties (the gossipers) may have subtle impact on the influence of gossip. Grosser, Kidwell-Lopez, and Labianca (2010) argue that when the two gossipers have a close or intimate friendship they may engage in both positive and negative gossip. Conversely, if the gossipers have an instrumental relationship as general colleagues or social contacts, they are more likely to engage in merely positive gossip.…”