1957
DOI: 10.1177/00220345570360061701
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Social Factor Associated with the Severity of Periodontal Disease

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

3
7
1

Year Published

1957
1957
2012
2012

Publication Types

Select...
9

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 33 publications
(11 citation statements)
references
References 3 publications
3
7
1
Order By: Relevance
“…These results agree with the studies of Russell,[15] Nikias et al .,[16] and Waerhaug,[17] which showed that prevalence of periodontal disease was inversely related to increasing family income.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…These results agree with the studies of Russell,[15] Nikias et al .,[16] and Waerhaug,[17] which showed that prevalence of periodontal disease was inversely related to increasing family income.…”
Section: Discussionsupporting
confidence: 93%
“…The number of years of education was significantly associated with the variables of periodontal health such that the more education one had, the better was his periodontal condition. This finding is again consistent with the results of other studies which related socioeconomic status to periodontal disease (Russell 1957, Russell & Ayers 1960, Kelly & Van Kirk 1965. Males were shown to have higher risk than females in major periodontal disease indicators such as gingivitis, average pocket depth, calculus, and plaque, being consistent with the findings of other studies (Russell 1957, Kelly & Van Kirk 1965.…”
Section: Methods Of Analysissupporting
confidence: 92%
“…Several indices have been reported which attempt to record the presence and extent of gingival inflammation, eg PMA index (Schour & Massler 1947), periodontal index (Russell 1957), gingival index (Loe & Silness 1963) and the gingival bleeding index (Ainamo & Bay 1975). These indices depend on clinical and visual assessment of inflammation and have several disadvantages.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%