2018
DOI: 10.1007/s10869-018-9542-0
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Social Exchange Perspective of Abusive Supervision and Knowledge Sharing: Investigating the Moderating Effects of Psychological Contract Fulfillment and Self-Enhancement Motive

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

6
82
1
2

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 74 publications
(91 citation statements)
references
References 67 publications
6
82
1
2
Order By: Relevance
“…For this study, we theorize that employees' power distance orientation and self-enhancement motive increase their sense of personal satisfaction when they respond to despotic leadership with ingratiatory activities (Guzman and Espejo 2015;Kwang and Swann 2010). That is, their belief that power differentials in leader-follower relations are instrumental for the effective functioning of organizations, as well as their general desire for self-enhancement and associated motivation to make a positive impression on others, might cause employees to find it particularly rewarding to ingratiate with their supervisors, even those who exhibit despotic tendencies (Choi et al 2019;Lian et al 2012).…”
Section: Cor Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…For this study, we theorize that employees' power distance orientation and self-enhancement motive increase their sense of personal satisfaction when they respond to despotic leadership with ingratiatory activities (Guzman and Espejo 2015;Kwang and Swann 2010). That is, their belief that power differentials in leader-follower relations are instrumental for the effective functioning of organizations, as well as their general desire for self-enhancement and associated motivation to make a positive impression on others, might cause employees to find it particularly rewarding to ingratiate with their supervisors, even those who exhibit despotic tendencies (Choi et al 2019;Lian et al 2012).…”
Section: Cor Theorymentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The question of how this personal factor, together with a self-enhancement motive, might trigger upward ingratiatory behavior and subsequent workplace status in response to despotic leadership thus might be particularly relevant for our study context but should be informative in other countries too. as despotism (Choi et al 2019;Lian et al 2012). They also complement each other; employees' power distance orientation is more externally oriented, capturing their views of acceptable power differences in the surrounding environment (Kirkman et al 2009), whereas a self-enhancement motive is more internally driven, reflecting a sensitivity and desire to be perceived in positive ways by other organizational members (Yun et al 2007).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…First, prior research on the relationship between abusive supervision, LMX and employee outcomes has used a raw score approach and has drawn on a social exchange explanation. The main argument is that by impairing leader-member relationships, abusive supervision causes employees to engage in negative reciprocation (Xu et al, 2012;Peng et al, 2014;Decoster et al, 2014;Choi et al, 2018). Our research goes one step further and advances our understanding of how do differentiated leader-member relationships matter in translating abusive supervision's negative effects.…”
Section: Theoretical Contributionsmentioning
confidence: 72%
“…LMX theory LMX theory argues that leaders play a significant role in developing differentiated relationships with each one of the subordinates within work groups (Graen, 1976;Graen and Uhl-Bien, 1995). Relations-oriented leader behaviors, such as supporting, recognizing and delegating, enhance LMX quality (Yukl et al, 2009;Mahsud et al, 2010;Dulebohn et al, 2012), whereas dysfunctional leader behaviors, such as engaging in illegal conduct and abusive supervision, are believed to reduce LMX quality (Harvey et al, 2006;Xu et al, 2012;Peng et al, 2014;Decoster et al, 2014;Choi et al, 2018). These findings also implied that employees may use their experienced leader behaviors to sense where they stand with the leader (Graen and Uhl-Bien, 1995).…”
Section: Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…On the one hand, knowledge management can effectively prevent or slow down the loss and depreciation of organizational knowledge by integrating organizational data, information and knowledge. On the other hand, it also supports the decision-making of organizational strategy (Choi, Kim, & Yun, 2019;Kim, Springer, Zhang, & Park, 2019); knowledge management is the specific support for the organization's knowledge management implementation. The existing research directions of knowledge management can be divided into knowledge management process, knowledge management strategy, knowledge classification, knowledge measurement, related research has been very rich.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%