2016
DOI: 10.1080/0022250x.2016.1159206
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A social-event based approach to sentiment analysis of identities and behaviors in text

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
15
0
1

Year Published

2018
2018
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
3
3

Relationship

2
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(16 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
15
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…From a methodological standpoint, we finally remark on the wide variety of tools used to further understand online hate speech dynamics. More specifically, we show how machine learning, network science methods, as well as insights from social scientific theory can be used to better understand online hate speech as it spreads ‘in the wild’ [ 45 , 63 , 76 , 80 ]. Burgeoning literature on online disinformation and social cybersecurity advocates such integrated approaches to understanding sociotechnical problems like online hate speech [ 15 , 22 , 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…From a methodological standpoint, we finally remark on the wide variety of tools used to further understand online hate speech dynamics. More specifically, we show how machine learning, network science methods, as well as insights from social scientific theory can be used to better understand online hate speech as it spreads ‘in the wild’ [ 45 , 63 , 76 , 80 ]. Burgeoning literature on online disinformation and social cybersecurity advocates such integrated approaches to understanding sociotechnical problems like online hate speech [ 15 , 22 , 34 ].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To determine the targets of hate speech, we employed an identity-based approach [17,50]. Past research had developed a comprehensive lexicon of identity terms which have also been made available on the Netmapper software [23,45]. Each identity term in the lexicon was further subdivided into four classes: political identities (e.g., senator, president), gendered identities (e.g., women, transgender), racial/ nationality identities (e.g., Black, Filipino), and religious identities (e.g., priest, imam).…”
Section: Identity Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…More specifically, we probe how network clusters with higher levels of hate speech systematically differ from others both in terms of structural (e.g., density, echo chambers) and functional (e.g., targeting of specific identities) features (Crenshaw 1990 ; Joseph et al. 2016 ; Kim 2020 ). Taken together, our findings bear theoretical and methodological implications for the scientific study of hate speech and understanding the pandemic’s broader societal impacts both online and offline (Luengo-Oroz et al.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While several studies have investigated how ACT could be used to evaluate different narrative forms, such as folktales, frames, retellings, and newspaper articles (Ahothali and Hoey 2015; Dunphy and MacKinnon 2002; Hunzaker 2016; Shuster and Campos-Castillo 2017), few have asked how narrative and character analysis might improve or expand concepts in affect control theory. In one extension, Joseph et al (2016) develop a model they apply to newspaper articles on the Arab uprisings that can extract social events from text and generate affective meanings for identities and behaviors not currently in ACT dictionaries. Just as models can now rely on public texts to help define EPA ratings, we can also turn to other cultural artifacts to better understand fundamental sentiments.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…ACT also details the importance of a third dimension, active versus passive. Although both are cultural approaches and highlight emotions, CT comes out of the analysis of cultural products, while ACT speaks to the social psychology of individuals and their motivations (although ACT has also been applied to news texts: Ahothali and Hoey 2015; Joseph et al 2016). We can use the findings of CT to test ACT predictions for these three identities.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%