2020
DOI: 10.1108/mf-02-2020-0091
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A social capital view of women on boards and their impact on firm performance

Abstract: PurposeThe objective of this paper is to leverage a two-sided view of social capital to develop a model of board gender diversity and firm performance using social capital data from Northeast Regional Center of Rural Development.Design/methodology/approachThe authors examine a large sample of 2,322 US publicly listed firms over the period 1996 to 2009. The final sample consists of 14,634 firm-year observations.FindingsThe authors find that when a firm's social network is not supportive of gender diversity, cor… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
8
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 12 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 68 publications
1
8
0
Order By: Relevance
“…According to the similarity-attraction viewpoint, interlocking male executives would prefer males over females for board assignments because men have more confidence and optimism than women (Markoczy et al 2020). Oldford et al (2021) found that for a large sample of US companies, female board affiliation is negatively related to firm performance in social groups that are not pro-diverse. Nielsen and Huse (2010) asserted that a female is self-assured in her fundamental beliefs and is expected to speak up when concerns raised in the board are contrary to her principles.…”
Section: Prior Literature and Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…According to the similarity-attraction viewpoint, interlocking male executives would prefer males over females for board assignments because men have more confidence and optimism than women (Markoczy et al 2020). Oldford et al (2021) found that for a large sample of US companies, female board affiliation is negatively related to firm performance in social groups that are not pro-diverse. Nielsen and Huse (2010) asserted that a female is self-assured in her fundamental beliefs and is expected to speak up when concerns raised in the board are contrary to her principles.…”
Section: Prior Literature and Theoretical Backgroundmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to increasing gender equality efforts, the presence of a a female on the board of directors of a company reflects the company's concern for gender equality. According to Oldford et al (2020), companies that support gender diversity will have more females on the board of directors than companies that do not support gender diversity. The presence of females can improve the company.…”
Section: Literature Review and Hypotheses Developmentmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, some researchers found different results. Oldford et al (2020); Kaur & Singh (2019), find that female directors have a negative impact on firm performance. Meanwhile, Thoomaszen & Hidayat (2020); Ionascu et al (2018); Rafinda, et al (2017), did not find a significant correlation between female directors and company performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 97%
“…In addition to increasing gender equality efforts, the presence of women on the board of directors of a company reflects the company's concern for gender equality. According to Oldford et al (2020), companies that support gender diversity will have more women on the board of directors than companies that do not support gender diversity. The presence of women can enhance the company.…”
Section: The Effect Of Gender On Board On Firm Performancementioning
confidence: 99%
“…Yet, several researchers have found different results. Oldford et al (2020) and Kaur and Singh (2019) found that female directors have a negative impact on firm performance. Meanwhile, (Amran et al (2014)), Dale-Olsen et al (2012), Shukeri et al (2012), Rose (2007) did not find a significant effect between female directors and company performance.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%