2005 IEEE International Symposium on Circuits and Systems
DOI: 10.1109/iscas.2005.1465828
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Smooth Power Flow Model of Electric Power System with Generator Reactive Power Limits Taken into Consideration

Abstract: This paper deals with power flow computation model in which generator reactive power limits are taken into account. The power flow computation in such a case includes a trial-and-error process, which mathematically implies undifferentiability. This paper illustrates a new differentiable power flow model that eliminates the trial-and-error process. In this power flow model, a polygonal line representing the Q-V capability characteristics of a generator is approximated by a hyperbola or a sigmoid function. It is… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
3
2

Citation Types

0
3
0
2

Publication Types

Select...
4
2

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 5 publications
0
3
0
2
Order By: Relevance
“…Corrective models of SCOPF allow limited adjustment of operating points in response to contingencies, i.e., redispatch, in post-contingency scenarios [18]. In this case, to account for a realistic post-contingency behavior of generators, additional constraints have to be incorporated into corrective models of SCOPF formulation [19]. These additional constraints are based on nonsmooth, i.e., discontinuous, curves of real and reactive power responses to avoid prevent both active and reactive power violations [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Corrective models of SCOPF allow limited adjustment of operating points in response to contingencies, i.e., redispatch, in post-contingency scenarios [18]. In this case, to account for a realistic post-contingency behavior of generators, additional constraints have to be incorporated into corrective models of SCOPF formulation [19]. These additional constraints are based on nonsmooth, i.e., discontinuous, curves of real and reactive power responses to avoid prevent both active and reactive power violations [20].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Alternative differentiable power flow models using hyperbolic and sigmoid functions [19], patching functions with complementary homotopy methods [21], and discrete and continuous auxiliary variables, are discussed in [13]. In this paper, we introduce several continuously-differentiable models that respect high-fidelity physical models of generators considering an extensive list of contingency scenarios.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In order to find further insights with actual application to the general power flow problem, one needs to look into the related areas of Optimal Power Flow (OPF). Many authors have approached the problem of calculating maximum loadability in the presence of limits using OPF techniques [15], but it was specifically the representation of control limits by means of complementarity constraints [16,17,18] that triggered new approaches to the general power flow [19,20], most notably [21]. One key idea in these papers is the realization that a power flow with control limits can be tackled as a constrained optimization problem, even though its aim is not computing a loadability limit.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Uma ideia similar foi proposta em (Kataoka 2005), no entanto o método proposto apresenta diculdades de convergência e requer múltiplas soluções do método de Newton-Raphson para se obter a solução do caso sob estudo.…”
Section: Formulação Suaveunclassified
“…Nesse contexto, acredita-se que a formulação suave de limites aqui proposta, por não exibir nenhuma das desvantagens do método proposto em (Kataoka 2005 …”
Section: Formulação Suaveunclassified