2019 International Conference on Issues and Challenges in Intelligent Computing Techniques (ICICT) 2019
DOI: 10.1109/icict46931.2019.8977659
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A smart System for Fake News Detection Using Machine Learning

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
23
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
4
4
1
1

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 121 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 7 publications
0
23
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Therefore, machine learning (ML) is one of the potential candidates as a counterstrategy to handle and classify the authenticity of a large volume of information automatically and in real-time. To identify fake news, scientists have developed ML-based false news and misinformation credibility inference models, which form a deep diffusive network model to memorize news articles, writers, and topics [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, machine learning (ML) is one of the potential candidates as a counterstrategy to handle and classify the authenticity of a large volume of information automatically and in real-time. To identify fake news, scientists have developed ML-based false news and misinformation credibility inference models, which form a deep diffusive network model to memorize news articles, writers, and topics [ 23 , 24 ].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Another study (Najar et al 2019) Fake news detection using Bayesian interference used Bag of Words using Multinomial Model (MM), Dirichlet Compound Multinomial (DCM) and Deterministic Annealing Expectation-Maximization(EDCM-DAEM) and EDCM-Bayesian, EDCM-Bayesian better accuracy than other classi ers, classi cation accuracy 87.85 on BS-Detector dataset. In study (Jain et al 2019;Reis et al 2019) used different textual features like language features (syntax) such as n-gram and part of speech tagging, lexical features (character and word-level signals), psycholinguistic features, semantic features and subjectivity and sentiment scores of a text using classi cation of K-Nearest neighbors (KNN), Naïve Bayes(NB), Random forests(RF), Support Vector Machine (SVM) with RBF kernel (SVM), and XGBoost (XGB). Random forest and XGB performed best using handcraft features, web-based networking media.…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 93%
“…Then, they suggested that meta-data and additional information can be utilized to improve the robustness and performance. Jain et al [21] proposed a mix of Naïve Bayes classifier, SVM, and natural language processing techniques on a fake news dataset and their model accuracy is up to 93.6% which was better than the baseline results by 6.85%. Reis et al [35] provided a great understanding of how features are used in the decisions taken by models.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 98%