2020
DOI: 10.1109/jsen.2020.2980207
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Smart Chair Sitting Posture Recognition System Using Flex Sensors and FPGA Implemented Artificial Neural Network

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
32
0
1

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

0
7

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 54 publications
(33 citation statements)
references
References 33 publications
0
32
0
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Moreover, custom HW implementations are tailored for a specific application or for a specific support, obviously, and require less physical resources than are proposed. This happens, for example, with the sitting posture recognition in [27], specifically designed to use six flexible sensors applied at the armrests, backrest and seat of a chair, in conjunction with a very compact two-layer Artificial NN (ANN) to classify seven sitting positions, representing the state-of-the-art solution for this specific problem. However, although the Artificial NN in [27] requires less physical resources than the FCN, (755 slice reg., 1822 FFs and 649 LUTs), it consumes more power (7.33 mW) with a much higher processing time of 267.5 µs to classify one posture less than the proposed one with an average accuracy of 97.43%.…”
Section: Comparison With the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Moreover, custom HW implementations are tailored for a specific application or for a specific support, obviously, and require less physical resources than are proposed. This happens, for example, with the sitting posture recognition in [27], specifically designed to use six flexible sensors applied at the armrests, backrest and seat of a chair, in conjunction with a very compact two-layer Artificial NN (ANN) to classify seven sitting positions, representing the state-of-the-art solution for this specific problem. However, although the Artificial NN in [27] requires less physical resources than the FCN, (755 slice reg., 1822 FFs and 649 LUTs), it consumes more power (7.33 mW) with a much higher processing time of 267.5 µs to classify one posture less than the proposed one with an average accuracy of 97.43%.…”
Section: Comparison With the Literaturementioning
confidence: 99%
“…The same approach [25] can be used in the case of the sitting posture since contact pressure is the only way to support body weight and influence posture and comfort [26]. However, recent works have demonstrated that the accuracy of such HPR systems strongly depends on the careful distribution of the sensors in specific key-points of the chair, bed or any other kind of support equipped with the system, in order to acquire data from as many body parts as possible and avoid an excessive number of sensors [27]. Therefore, the reliability of pressure-based HPR systems appears much too dependent on the shapes of the specific supports.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…19 Hu et al established an ANN network-based posture classification model by placing six flexible sensors under an office chair, which was implemented on a Spartan6 programmable gate array, and experiments showed that the model floating-point evaluation accuracy is 97.78% and the maximum propagation delay is 8.714 ns, which is highly applicable. 20 Sazonov's team used wearable sensors to build an SVM-based framework for SVM and polynomial logic recognition, and used the labeled data for PAC/EE algorithm training, using fast artificial neural networks (FANNs) to train the MLDs model, the model has been experimentally demonstrated to be effective in reducing execution time for real-time biofeedback systems. 21 In 2016, Xu et al identified sleep posture through pressure-sensitive sensor sheets, using the moving distance to use the pressure-sensitive image as a weighted 2D image, combined with earth mover's distance and Euclidean metric for similarity measurement, and experimentally demonstrated that the model improved accuracy by 8.01% compared with traditional sleep posture recognition methods.…”
Section: Sensor-based Gesture Recognitionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Due to the low‐power, low‐cost, small size, and high‐performance characteristics of sensors, the field of sensor‐based recognition is more integrated with the application field 19 . Hu et al established an ANN network‐based posture classification model by placing six flexible sensors under an office chair, which was implemented on a Spartan6 programmable gate array, and experiments showed that the model floating‐point evaluation accuracy is 97.78% and the maximum propagation delay is 8.714 ns, which is highly applicable 20 . Sazonov's team used wearable sensors to build an SVM‐based framework for SVM and polynomial logic recognition, and used the labeled data for PAC/EE algorithm training, using fast artificial neural networks (FANNs) to train the MLDs model, the model has been experimentally demonstrated to be effective in reducing execution time for real‐time biofeedback systems 21 .…”
Section: Related Workmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…At present, there are three main ways of sitting posture recognition, which are based on machine vision [ 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 ], wearable motion sensors [ 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 ] and external pressure sensors [ 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 ]. Although machine vision technology has achieved great success in the field of posture recognition [ 26 ], it is difficult to work normally in situations with many obstacles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%