2018
DOI: 10.5194/hess-2018-220
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A small volume multiplexed pumping system for automated, high frequency water chemistry measurements in volume-limited applications

Abstract: Abstract. An automated multiplexed pumping system (MPS) for high frequency water chemistry measurements at multiple locations was previously reported. This technology showed potential to increase spatial and temporal resolution of data and improve our understanding of biogeochemical processes in aquatic environments and at the land-water interface. The design of the previous system precludes its use in volume-limited applications where highly frequent measurements requiring large sample volume would significan… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
9
0

Year Published

2018
2018
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
4
1

Relationship

2
3

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(9 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
9
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Stock tank and column outflow water chemistry were measured using a small volume multiplexed pumping system (MPS) (Maxwell et al, 2018) coupled to a high frequency spectrophotometer. The MPS sequentially pumped 25‐mL samples from each column for absorbance measurement by a field spectrophotometer (Spectro::lyser Type SP‐1‐035‐p0‐s‐NO‐075; s::can) fitted with a 4‐mm path length, 1.1‐mL flow through quartz cuvette (46‐Q‐4, Starna Cells, Inc.).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Stock tank and column outflow water chemistry were measured using a small volume multiplexed pumping system (MPS) (Maxwell et al, 2018) coupled to a high frequency spectrophotometer. The MPS sequentially pumped 25‐mL samples from each column for absorbance measurement by a field spectrophotometer (Spectro::lyser Type SP‐1‐035‐p0‐s‐NO‐075; s::can) fitted with a 4‐mm path length, 1.1‐mL flow through quartz cuvette (46‐Q‐4, Starna Cells, Inc.).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…polytetrafluoroethylene tubing (0.2 mL s −1 ) through a 60‐μm plankton mesh screened intake placed in the top 3 cm of the saturated media in each column. To minimize cross‐contamination between columns, the first 5 mL of sample volume were diverted to waste, after which 20 mL of sample volume (>18 times cuvette volume) were pumped for spectrophotometric analysis, according to validated sampling procedures for the small volume MPS (Maxwell et al, 2018). Low pump rate and sample volume (25 mL every 2 h) were used to limit impact of sampling on column hydraulics (sample volume <2% of cumulative flow volume over 2 h).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The accuracy of load calculations is dependent on the accuracy of flow and concentration measurements (Pinckney et al., 2001). Here, the efficacy of using DGTDGT for determining the load was modeled using nitrate concentration and flow data measured over 1 mo from a denitrifying bioreactor (Corbett et al., 2019; Maxwell et al., 2018). The bioreactor data were used because they provided a data set with pronounced variations in concentration and flow, and the high frequency of sampling enabled an accurate calculation of the load.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The bioreactor data were used because they provided a data set with pronounced variations in concentration and flow, and the high frequency of sampling enabled an accurate calculation of the load. Nitrate concentrations were determined by grab sampling at 30‐ and 60‐min intervals, and flow measurements were independently measured at the same interval (Corbett et al., 2019; Maxwell et al., 2018). Denitrifying bioreactors are anaerobic carbon‐rich systems designed to support the microbial transformation of excess nitrate to N 2 (g) (Addy et al., 2016; Rivett et al., 2008; Schipper et al., 2010).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…All data presented in this paper in Sects. 2.3.1, 2.3.2, 3.1, 3.2, 4.2, and 4.3 are provided in .csv files in an online Zenodo repository at https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.1453353 (Maxwell, 2018). The online repository also includes the R code (R Studio Ver.1.1.442 or greater) used to generate plots and calculate coefficients for NO − 3 removal kinetic equations.…”
Section: Seasonal and Spatial Variabilitymentioning
confidence: 99%