A Small Study of Training in Motivational Interviewing: Does One Workshop Change Clinician and Client Behavior?

Abstract

Professional training in motivational interviewing, as on many other topics, is often delivered via a one-time clinical workshop. To what extent do practitioners actually acquire skillfulness through such training? Twenty-two counselors participated in training, of whom 15 completed a study of changes in practice behavior up to 4 months after a motivational interviewing workshop. In addition to self-report questionnaires, they provided taped practice samples before and after training, which were coded for counselor and client behavior. On paper-and-pencil measures, participants reported large increases in motivational interviewing skills. Observational measures reflected more modest changes in practice behavior that were often retained 4 months after training. Clients, however, did not show the response changes that have been found to be predictive of better outcomes with motivational interviewing. While practice behavior changed to a statistically significant extent, the effect of training was apparently not large enough to make a difference in client response. Possible implications for training and quality control of psychotherapies are considered.

Dynamics of Resistance to Change: A Sequential Analysis of Change Agents in Action

“…The original language categorization into desire and ability originates from psycholinguistic laboratory studies using quasi-performative verbs (Amrhein, 1992). This categorization has been extended in therapy field research integrating commitment (Mahrer, Gagnon, Fairweather, Boulet, & Herring, 1994), reasons, need, and taking steps (Aharonovich et al, 2008;Amrhein et al, 2003;Baer et al, 2008) and is incorporated within the observation coding manuals for MI (Martin, Moyers, Houck, Christopher, & Miller, 2005;Miller & Mount, 2001;Miller et al, 2008). Whereas earlier MI coding manuals could only predict the lack of behaviour change based on resistance language (i.e.…”

Integrating Motivational Interviewing and Self-Determination Theory With Cognitive Behavioral Therapy to Prevent Suicide

“…We were interested in demonstrating that MI could be used with suicidal patients and coded 20 minutes from 15 interviews using the Motivational Interviewing Treatment Integrity (MITI) coding system. Summary variables used to determine MI proficiency (Miller & Mount, 2001) indicated that the clinicians indeed used MI with suicidal patients. The average MI spirit was 5.20 (.94) on a 7 point scale, 95% of clinician utterances were MI consistent, clinicians used 7.73 reflections to every question, 52% of questions were open-ended, and 67% of reflections were complex rather than simple.…”

Computer-based brief motivational intervention for perinatal drug use

“…However, there are clear challenges to the broad implementation of even brief interventions. For example, training in brief motivational interventions (typically using a two full-day format) has led to changes in provider behavior only on some key skill measures, and many trainees show improvement that is either transient or of insufficient magnitude (Baer et al, 2004;Miller & Mount, 2001). Further, it has been estimated that full compliance with all preventive activities recommended by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force would require 4.4 hours per working day for primary care physicians working with adults (Yarnall, Pollak, Ostbye, Krause, & Michener, 2003).…”