2023
DOI: 10.1186/s13104-023-06615-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A small stretch of poor codon usage at the beginning of dengue virus open reading frame may act as a translational checkpoint

Maneenop Yimyaem,
Kunlakanya Jitobaom,
Prasert Auewarakul

Abstract: Objective Rare codons were previously shown to be enriched at the beginning of the dengue virus (DENV) open reading frame. However, the role of rare codons in regulating translation efficiency and replication of DENV remains unclear. The present study aims to clarify the significance of rare codon usage at the beginning of DENV transcripts using the codon adaptation index (CAI). Methodology CAIs of the whole starting regions of DENV transcripts as … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1

Citation Types

0
1
0

Year Published

2024
2024
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1

Relationship

0
1

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 1 publication
(1 citation statement)
references
References 24 publications
0
1
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Despite 43279 showed no substitutions in the amino acid sequence, it differed by one nucleotide in both the Env and Ns3 gene sequences compared to K15P38. Although these differences seem minor, variations in its genome sequence could have influenced the RNA secondary structure or codon usage, potentially affecting the replication cycle [ 31–33 ]. Sangju has been fully sequenced only for the Env gene, and when compared to 43413, the differences are more significant than those between 43279 and K15P38.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Despite 43279 showed no substitutions in the amino acid sequence, it differed by one nucleotide in both the Env and Ns3 gene sequences compared to K15P38. Although these differences seem minor, variations in its genome sequence could have influenced the RNA secondary structure or codon usage, potentially affecting the replication cycle [ 31–33 ]. Sangju has been fully sequenced only for the Env gene, and when compared to 43413, the differences are more significant than those between 43279 and K15P38.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%