1985
DOI: 10.1016/0165-1765(85)90226-5
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A small-sample correction for the likelihood ratio test

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
13
0
4

Year Published

1992
1992
2016
2016

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

0
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 52 publications
(17 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
13
0
4
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, simulation studies [e.g., Ohtani and Toyoda (1985), Frydenberg and Jensen (1989), Hollas (1991), Rocke (1989), Wong (1989Wong ( , 1991 and Gonzalo and Pitarakis (1994)] suggest that in many instances Bartlett adjustments do not work well. A simpler correction factor is proposed by Italianer (1985), but the procedure is rather heuristic and has little theoretical background.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Furthermore, simulation studies [e.g., Ohtani and Toyoda (1985), Frydenberg and Jensen (1989), Hollas (1991), Rocke (1989), Wong (1989Wong ( , 1991 and Gonzalo and Pitarakis (1994)] suggest that in many instances Bartlett adjustments do not work well. A simpler correction factor is proposed by Italianer (1985), but the procedure is rather heuristic and has little theoretical background.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Likelihood ratio tests failed to reject both strong and product form separability at the 0.01 significance level; however, both were rejected at the 0.05 significance level. Moschini and colleagues (1994) note that LR tests are biased toward rejection, particularly for large demand systems, and suggest a test correction proposed by Italianer (1985). Although this correction did increase the p-values for each test, strong separability and product form separability were still rejected at the 0.05 significance level.…”
Section: Empirical Results and Discussionmentioning
confidence: 88%
“…Apesar de não existir uma forma inequívoca de se ajustar o teste LR de modo a atenuar tal viés, Moschini et al (1994) verificam que o ajuste proposto por Italianer (1975) apresenta bom desempenho quando aplicado a sistemas não lineares de equações de demanda. A estatís-tica do teste LR ajustado de Italianer (1975) é:…”
Section: Testes De Hipóteses E Seleção Do Modelo Preferidounclassified