A Sly Civility: Colossians and Empire

Abstract

This article relates Colossian vocabulary, motifs and theological themes to the cultural situation of the cult of the emperor. The author’s language and conceptualization of reconciliation as a cosmic and earthly peace (Col.1.15-23) reflects an imperial backdrop and utilizes civic vocabulary typical of Greek and Roman treatments of concord. His representation of Jesus’ death as a Roman triumph (2.15), and the incorporation of all humankind—including barbarians and Scythians—in a trans-ethnic unity (3.11) similarly reflects the geopolitical notions of a worldwide Roman Empire. The imperial imprint on the Household Code (3.18-4.1) is recognizable through attention to numismatic representations of Nero and his consort enjoying a divinely appointed familial concord. Though used by court theologians like Eusebius of Caesarea to legitimate a Christian application of Empire, the letter may be read as a destabilization of Empire inasmuch as it derives imperial-sounding ideals from the crucifixion of Jesus.

Editorial Introduction

“…In particular, we might probe the significance of these representations for early Christian ritual and identity. In recent years, there has been much attention given to the interaction between imperial ideology and early Christian discourse, including the relationship between imperial iconography and Pauline ideology (Lopez, 2008; Maier, 2005). In line with this scholarship, Tulloch draws our attention to the Ara Pacis (Augustus’ Altar of Peace) where children play a role in the intertwining of the religious and political functions of the imperial cult.…”