2017
DOI: 10.1111/1744-7917.12459
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A slow‐growth high‐mortality meta‐analysis for insects: A comment on Chen and Chen

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 5 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…; Murphy et al . in press). We analysed the type of selective force (top‐down or bottom‐up) as an individual moderator, and analysed habitat/environment type and subtypes, diet breadth, feeding guild and taxonomic group as the interaction with the selective force type (main effects were also included).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…; Murphy et al . in press). We analysed the type of selective force (top‐down or bottom‐up) as an individual moderator, and analysed habitat/environment type and subtypes, diet breadth, feeding guild and taxonomic group as the interaction with the selective force type (main effects were also included).…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, the slow-growth high-mortality hypothesis predicts that prolonged larval development, due to a low quality of the host-plant, increases the mortality of herbivores from their natural enemies [5]. Although the general validity of this hypothesis is still debated [6,7], it could explain the strategies developed by some insect species to decrease the impact of whole plant quality on their developmental time. In particular, two feeding strategies are generally considered as adaptation to optimize the nutritional quality of the exploited plant tissues: gall-inducing and leaf-mining.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…), but the validity of this hypothesis is controversial (Chen & Chen ; Murphy et al . ). Our results are an exception to this hypothesis; prolongation of the larval period gave rise to higher survival when predation risk from conspecifics is high.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 97%