2002
DOI: 10.1016/s0379-0738(01)00639-9
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A “skin–skull–brain model” for the biomechanical reconstruction of blunt forces to the human head

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2

Citation Types

1
53
0

Year Published

2007
2007
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
8
1

Relationship

1
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 49 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 11 publications
1
53
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The need for having a test has involved the construction of advanced mechanical models, e.g. [11], to match a weapon to a crime and to reconstruct trauma. Thali et al reported morphologically reproducible results, and their model also reproduced blunt force injuries to the skin and periost [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…The need for having a test has involved the construction of advanced mechanical models, e.g. [11], to match a weapon to a crime and to reconstruct trauma. Thali et al reported morphologically reproducible results, and their model also reproduced blunt force injuries to the skin and periost [11].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…[11], to match a weapon to a crime and to reconstruct trauma. Thali et al reported morphologically reproducible results, and their model also reproduced blunt force injuries to the skin and periost [11]. Another way of matching the weapon to the victim is the use of CT-imaging specifically cranial computed tomography (CT) [7].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It would therefore seem that such material would be an obvious choice, however, this point hinges on the extent to which these replicas respond to dynamic impacts in ways that are analogous to real bone. In a series of papers Thali et al [1,2,3,4] claimed that similar replicas produced results that were highly accurate with regard to ballistic and blunt-force trauma, although these studies concentrated largely on simulated soft tissue at bullet entrance and exit points and the general appearance of fracture patterns at a gross scale. Thali et al [1,2,3,4] focused on a small range of modern firearms and a mechanism of blunt trauma, if such samples are viable substitutes for human crania they should hold equal potential for investigations of other mechanisms of injury.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In an early study, Lee et al [18] created artificial blunt-force injuries using nineteen cadavers, and assessed these according to frequency, length, and depth of wounding. A more recent study by Thali et al [19] saw the introduction of an artificial skin-skull-brain model consisting of silicone rubber casts, on to which a mass was dropped to create lacerations. Unfortunately, neither the impact forces used, nor quantitative data on the injuries caused were published.…”
mentioning
confidence: 99%