A site selection methodology for CO2 underground storage in deep saline aquifers: case of the Paris Basin

Grataloup, Sandrine; Bonijoly, D.; Brosse, É.; Dreux, Rémi; García, Daniel; Hasanov, Vladimir; Lescanne, Marc; Renoux, P.; Thoraval, Alain

doi:10.1016/j.egypro.2009.02.068

Cited by 55 publications

(20 citation statements)

References 1 publication

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Order By: Relevance

“…There are some previous studies proposing a variety of solution methods for finding the optimum location for CO 2 storage (Kissinger et al, 2014;Ramirez et al, 2009;Stasa et al, 2013;Grataloup et al, 2009) and only a few of them are based on MCDM (Hsu et al, 2012;Llamas and Cienfuegos, 2012;Llamas and Camara, 2014).…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making for carbon dioxide geological storage in Turkey

Deveci

Demirel

John

et al. 2015

Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making for carbon dioxide geological storage in Turkey

Deveci

Demirel

John

et al. 2015

Journal of Natural Gas Science and Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

“…Grataloup et al (2009) proposed a site selection methodology for underground storage of CO 2 in deep saline aquifers. Casamayor and Snyder (2002) carried out a research in case of bud-site selection.…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Examination of compensatory model application in site selection

Zaredar

Zarkesh

2011

Environ Monit Assess

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

Nowadays, usage of compensatory models in land evaluation process and site selection is broadly observed. Meanwhile, methods such as analytical hierarchy process are used more than the others. Whether the usage of compensatory model methods in site selection studies is essentially correct or not is an issue that should be hesitated. In this model, inefficiency of a factor, to be offset by strength of others, means that in urban development site selection, if somewhere has unsuitable aspect but suitable slope, the aspect deficiency will be compensated by the slope. But quodlibet reflection is that in this model, sometimes, deficiency of proximity to fault can be compensated by other parameters strength. And finally, a place is diagnosed as a suitable area for urban development that is close to the fault. This research aims at examination of compensatory models application in urban development site selection of Taleghan Basin using analytical hierarchy process as one of the compensatory model methods. Among this the weaknesses and strengths of compensatory model were analyzed carefully. Results indicate that despite usefulness of this model in being fast, easy, and low expense, it has some weaknesses like very high sensitivity to decision maker's idea.

show abstract

“…For example, Grataloup et al (2009) focused on-site selection for CO2 underground storage in deep saline aquifers [10]. Another study addressed different aspects while considering potential CO2 storage reservoirs, including safety and economic feasibility of each location [8].…”

Section: Introductionmentioning

confidence: 99%

Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Geological Carbon Dioxide Storage in Turkey¬

Ertis¹

2018

Anadolu University Journal of Science and Technology-a Applied Sciences and Engineering

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

In contemporary era, carbon sequestration has become an important issue. Rapidly increasing population, higher lifestandards and technological advancements consistently increase the amount of emissions, especially CO2. Nowadays, the most promising solution is to minimize the carbon dioxide emissions with using carbon capture and storage (CCS) technologies for a better future. The problem is to choose the best location for CO2 storage which is a crucial and challenging multicriteria decision problem. The objective of this paper is to determine the most appropriate city for carbon dioxide storage in Turkey, by demonstrating a successful implementation of Multi-criteria Decision Making (MCDM) tool. This study presents the use of MCDM method based on Technique for Order Preference by Similarity to Ideal Solution (TOPSIS) to assess the suitable location for CO2 storage. For that purpose, 4 alternative locations were evaluated via 8 criteria which are determined according to the opinions of the experts with background information from the field. Towards this end, MCDM method, namely, TOPSIS, was utilized for the location evaluation. Consequently, this method detects Diyarbakır as CO2 storage area which is also one of the most important city of Turkey for having finished oil reservoirs and for its geopolitical location.

show abstract

A site selection methodology for CO2 underground storage in deep saline aquifers: case of the Paris Basin

Cited by 55 publications

References 1 publication

Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making for carbon dioxide geological storage in Turkey

Fuzzy multi-criteria decision making for carbon dioxide geological storage in Turkey

Examination of compensatory model application in site selection

Application of Multi-Criteria Decision Making for Geological Carbon Dioxide Storage in Turkey¬

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About