SummaryLocum doctors are often perceived to present greater risks of causing harm to
patients than permanent doctors. After eligibility and quality assessment, eight
empirical and 34 non-empirical papers were included in a narrative synthesis to
establish what was known about the quality and safety of locum medical practice.
Empirical literature was limited and weak methodologically. Locums enabled
healthcare organisations to maintain appropriate staffing levels and allowed
staffing flexibility, but they also gave rise to concerns about continuity of
care, patient safety, team function and cost. There was some evidence to suggest
that the way locum doctors are recruited, employed and used by organisations,
may result in a higher risk of harm to patients. A better understanding of the
quality and safety of locum working is needed to improve the use of locum
doctors and the quality and safety of patient care that they provide.