2022 IEEE 4th International Conference on Artificial Intelligence Circuits and Systems (AICAS) 2022
DOI: 10.1109/aicas54282.2022.9869855
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A single-stage detector of cerebral microbleeds using 3D feature fused region proposal network (FFRP-Net)

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1

Citation Types

0
5
0

Year Published

2022
2022
2023
2023

Publication Types

Select...
2

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(5 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
0
5
0
Order By: Relevance
“…This article presents a direct comparison with other 3D detection models that were implemented on the same dataset. Even though other works in the literature presented methods of automatic CMBs detection that employed 3D networks, [7][8][9]12,16 most of the frameworks were not implemented as single networks nor end-to-end structures, which may cause difficulties when seeking to incorporate them into routine clinical use. Therefore, for comparison, this study built the 3D Faster R-CNN as an end-to-end structure for CMBs detection and compared the testing performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 4 more Smart Citations
“…This article presents a direct comparison with other 3D detection models that were implemented on the same dataset. Even though other works in the literature presented methods of automatic CMBs detection that employed 3D networks, [7][8][9]12,16 most of the frameworks were not implemented as single networks nor end-to-end structures, which may cause difficulties when seeking to incorporate them into routine clinical use. Therefore, for comparison, this study built the 3D Faster R-CNN as an end-to-end structure for CMBs detection and compared the testing performance.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Therefore, for comparison, this study built the 3D Faster R‐CNN as an end‐to‐end structure for CMBs detection and compared the testing performance. Furthermore, this study directly compared TPE‐Det against the most recently presented deep learning detection models with two‐stage 10 and single‐stage structures 16 on the same dataset. As a result, the proposed TPE‐Det achieved significantly higher precision ( P < 0.02) with higher sensitivity and a lower FP avg .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations