2016
DOI: 10.1002/admi.201600942
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Single‐Phase, All‐Solid‐State Sodium Battery Using Na3−xV2−xZrx(PO4)3 as the Cathode, Anode, and Electrolyte

Abstract: “Single‐phase” all‐solid‐state battery, based on Na3−xV2−xZrx(PO4)3 as the cathode, anode, and electrolyte, is reported. It successfully undergoes room temperature charge–discharge reactions based on the V3+/V2+ (anode) and V3+/V4+ (cathode) redox systems with insertion reaction. The interfacial resistance is essentially zero at the anode and cathode.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

1
30
0

Year Published

2017
2017
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
5
2

Relationship

2
5

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 44 publications
(31 citation statements)
references
References 22 publications
1
30
0
Order By: Relevance
“…The OCV of Li 3 V 1.6 Al 0.4 (PO 4 ) 3 was more stable than Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 , which suggests that suppression of the electronic conductivity in the Al‐doped Li 3 V 2‐x Al x (PO 4 ) 3 sample contributed to the large discharge capacity. This is in good agreement with our previously reported results for a single‐phase sodium battery with Na 2.6 V 1.6 Zr 0.4 (PO 4 ) 3 , where a much higher discharge capacity than that with Na 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 , and where the OCV of the Na 2.6 V 1.6 Zr 0.4 (PO 4 ) 3 cell was more stable than that for the Na 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 cell . Therefore, both high ionic conductivity and low electronic conductivity are required for a single‐phase all‐solid‐state battery.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…The OCV of Li 3 V 1.6 Al 0.4 (PO 4 ) 3 was more stable than Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 , which suggests that suppression of the electronic conductivity in the Al‐doped Li 3 V 2‐x Al x (PO 4 ) 3 sample contributed to the large discharge capacity. This is in good agreement with our previously reported results for a single‐phase sodium battery with Na 2.6 V 1.6 Zr 0.4 (PO 4 ) 3 , where a much higher discharge capacity than that with Na 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 , and where the OCV of the Na 2.6 V 1.6 Zr 0.4 (PO 4 ) 3 cell was more stable than that for the Na 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 cell . Therefore, both high ionic conductivity and low electronic conductivity are required for a single‐phase all‐solid‐state battery.…”
Section: Resultssupporting
confidence: 92%
“…This is in good agreement with our previously reported results for a single-phase sodium battery 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 17 18 19 20 21 22 23 24 25 26 27 28 29 30 31 32 33 34 35 36 37 38 39 40 41 42 43 44 45 46 47 48 49 50 51 52 53 54 55 56 57 with Na 2.6 V 1.6 Zr 0.4 (PO 4 ) 3 , where a much higher discharge capacity than that with Na 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 , and where the OCV of the Na 2.6 V 1.6 Zr 0.4 (PO 4 ) 3 cell was more stable than that for the Na 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 cell. [10] Therefore, both high ionic conductivity and low electronic conductivity are required for a single-phase all-solidstate battery. Although the reason for the declined electronic conduction in Al-doped sample(Li 3 V 1.6 Al 0.4 (PO 4 ) 3 ) is still not clear, there is possibility of the band gap is increased by adding Al in Li 3 V 2 (PO 4 ) 3 .…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…The NASICON (Na Super Ionic CONductor)‐type materials are well‐known as promising candidates for electrolyte and electrode . We have recently reported NASICON‐type single‐phase all‐solid‐state batteries that are made from a single material using Na 3 V 2‐x Zr x (PO 4 ) 3 , Li 3 V 2‐x Al x (PO 4 ) 3 , and Li 1.5 Cr 0.5 Ti 1.5 (PO 4 ) 3 . In the single‐phase battery, a single material can function as the anode, cathode, and electrolyte.…”
Section: Figurementioning
confidence: 99%