1989
DOI: 10.1088/0954-3899/15/9/009
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A single-particle model momentum distribution for4He

Abstract: The nucleon momentum distribution for 4He is obtained analytically by means of a single particle (SP) potential which contains both an attractive and a repulsive part. It

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
12
0

Year Published

1990
1990
2020
2020

Publication Types

Select...
7
1

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 14 publications
(12 citation statements)
references
References 23 publications
(24 reference statements)
0
12
0
Order By: Relevance
“…One can expect that this term simulates to some extent the effects of strong repulsion in the nucleon-nucleon interaction at small distances. The single-particle potential (22) had been suggested and used [23,24,25] for the study of charge formfactors and nucleon momentum distributions of light nuclei. One of the main advantages of this potential is that analytical expressions are derived for the single-particle wave functions and for other useful quantities 6 (see e.g., [25]).…”
Section: Body Density Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…One can expect that this term simulates to some extent the effects of strong repulsion in the nucleon-nucleon interaction at small distances. The single-particle potential (22) had been suggested and used [23,24,25] for the study of charge formfactors and nucleon momentum distributions of light nuclei. One of the main advantages of this potential is that analytical expressions are derived for the single-particle wave functions and for other useful quantities 6 (see e.g., [25]).…”
Section: Body Density Matrixmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…This is a general feature of wave functions with short-range correlations which reproduce theoretical Fon at high momentum transfer better than those obtained with usual single particle potentials. A strong repulsion in the single particle potential may % however ( improve the results considerably (Gibson et al 1968, Grypeos et al 1989.Also, form factors ob tained with wave functions derived from usual Hartee-Fock calculations,are not expected to fit well the experimental Fcn(q) for large values of q (Friedrich et al 1986) .…”
Section: The Expression Of the Charge Form Factor Of *<>Ca Nucleusmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The best thing which seems that one can do is to 1Q5 use the "fixed centre of mass correction " [29] which for \He leads to the expression F{q) J,PvF<(o>) (16) The integrations in the above expressions are carried out numerically in our case, which is not so convenient and it is also expected to lead to inaccuracies, in particular at large values of momentum transfers. They are feasible, however, and we have in fact used expression (16) in reporting our first results for \Ht [24]. For heavier nuclei, it is impracticable to use such a procedure in our approach.…”
Section: The Analytic Expressions For the Elastic Form Factors And The Momentum Distributionsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…It is usefull to recall that a single-particle wave function (Slater determinant) cannot reproduce simultaneously the charge form factor and the momentum distribution of a correlated system [19]. As our first results for 4 He [24] indicate, however, one might be able to considerably improve the values of tf{k), calculated with an harmonic oscillator single particle wave function, in which the parameters have been fixed by fitting to the experimental charge form factor. This is achieved by suitably modifying the single particle potential.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%