2003
DOI: 10.1016/j.displa.2004.01.002
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A single marine overlay display is more efficient than separate chart and radar displays

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
3
0

Year Published

2005
2005
2008
2008

Publication Types

Select...
5

Relationship

1
4

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 7 publications
(3 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
0
3
0
Order By: Relevance
“…While trained engineering students detected faults in the plain physical schematic faster than in the more complex model (the four-panel model was worst), they diagnosed and corrected faults fastest on the information-rich superimposed display. Donderi and McFadden (2003) tested both professional mariners and university undergraduates on a question-answering task based on marine electronic radar and chart displays. Efficiency (accuracy/speed) to answer display-based questions was better for both observer groups when the radar image was superimposed over the chart image, resulting in a display noticeably more complex than when the radar and chart displays were presented side by side.…”
Section: Visual Displaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…While trained engineering students detected faults in the plain physical schematic faster than in the more complex model (the four-panel model was worst), they diagnosed and corrected faults fastest on the information-rich superimposed display. Donderi and McFadden (2003) tested both professional mariners and university undergraduates on a question-answering task based on marine electronic radar and chart displays. Efficiency (accuracy/speed) to answer display-based questions was better for both observer groups when the radar image was superimposed over the chart image, resulting in a display noticeably more complex than when the radar and chart displays were presented side by side.…”
Section: Visual Displaysmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Where the application of JPEG compression techniques is perhaps more justified is in the measurement of images such as electronic charts and radar screens (Donderi, 2006a(Donderi, , 2006bDonderi & McFadden, 2003). In these highly detailed and colorized environments, JPEG compression file sizes can correlate highly with subjective measures of image complexity (between 25% and 85% of the variance).…”
Section: Measuring Complexity: Why Should Automated Measurement Be Pomentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The compressed file length of electronic chart, radar and chart-radar overlay displays predicts their subjective complexity (Donderi, 2004;Donderi, 2000;Donderi, 1999;Donderi & McFadden, 2004, 1999. This experiment shows that compressed file length also predicts target search performance for the same displays.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%