A Single Institution Experience of Seven Hundred Consecutively placed Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters

Sainathan, Sandeep; Hempstead, Margaret; Andaz, Shahriyour

doi:10.5301/jva.5000248

Cited by 24 publications

(59 citation statements)

References 8 publications

(30 reference statements)

Supporting

Mentioning

Contrasting

Unclassified

Order By: Relevance

“…11 The most commonly used alternative mode of venous access is peripherally inserted central catheters (PICCs). [12][13][14][15][16][17][18][19][20] These catheters provide prolonged central venous access, are considered cost effective, 21,22 and have a longer indwelling time before the risk of LOS increases. 23 The risk of LOS associated with PICCs has been reported to increase after an indwelling time of 35 days, 24 compared with 7 days with UVCs.…”

Section: What This Study Addsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk of Infection Using Peripherally Inserted Central and Umbilical Catheters in Preterm Neonates

Shalabi¹,

Adel²,

Yoon³

et al. 2015

Pediatrics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

OBJECTIVE: To compare the rates of catheter-associated bloodstream infection (CABSI) in preterm infants born at <30 weeks’ gestation who received a peripherally inserted central catheter (PICC) versus an umbilical venous catheter (UVC) immediately after birth as their primary venous access. METHODS: This retrospective matched cohort study examined data from infants born at <30 weeks’ gestation and admitted between January 2010 and December 2013 to neonatal units in the Canadian Neonatal Network. Eligible infants who received a PICC on the first day after birth (day 1) were matched with 2 additional groups of infants, those who received a UVC on day 1 and those who received a UVC on day 1 that was then changed for a PICC after 4 days or more. The primary outcome was number of infants with CABSI per 1000 catheter days, which was compared between the 3 groups using multivariable analyses. RESULTS: Data from 540 eligible infants were reviewed (180 per group). There was no significant difference in infants with CABSI/1000 catheter days between the 3 groups (9.3 vs 7.8 vs 8.2/1000 catheter days, respectively; P > .05) despite lower rates of late onset sepsis in the group of infants who received only a UVC. CONCLUSIONS: There was no significant difference in the incidence of CABSI between very preterm neonates who received a PICC, UVC, or UVC followed by PICC as the primary mode of venous access after birth. A prospective randomized controlled trial is justified to further guide practice regarding primary venous access and reduction of infection.

show abstract

Section: What This Study Addsmentioning

confidence: 99%

Risk of Infection Using Peripherally Inserted Central and Umbilical Catheters in Preterm Neonates

Shalabi¹,

Adel²,

Yoon³

et al. 2015

Pediatrics

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

show abstract

“…Наиболее частой среди технических трудностей, возникающих при установке, следует отметить миграцию дистального конца катетера во внутреннюю яремную вену против тока крови (рис. ), что коррелирует с литературными данны-ми [1,4,5]. Установленный факт свидетельствует о необходимости применения интраоперационной рентгеноскопии, однако результаты, полученные некоторыми авторами, позволяют рассматривать установку ЦКПВ под мониторингом интраопераци-онной электрокардиограммы (ЭКГ) [6][7][8].…”

Section: оригинальные статьиunclassified

Picc in the Treatment of Children With Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Study

Юрьевич¹,

Александрович²,

Владимирович³

et al. 2017

Oncopediatria

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

43ОРИГИНАЛЬНЫЕ СТАТЬИ ОБОСНОВАНИЕ Центральные катетеры, вводимые через пери-ферическую вену (ЦКПВ 1 ), -это используемые при лечении детей с онкологическими заболева-ниями системы венозного доступа со средним по продолжительности сроком эксплуатации. Такой

show abstract

“…Миграция дистального конца катетера во внутреннюю яремную вену против тока крови отмечалась у 19% пациентов, что сви-детельствует о необходимости применения интра-операционной рентгеноскопии. Данной тактики придерживаются и другие специалисты [4][5][6]. При этом некоторые авторы рекомендуют выполнять установку ЦКПВ и ИВПС у взрослых пациентов с использованием интраоперационной электро-кардиографии [7][8][9].…”

Section: нежелательные явленияunclassified

Venous Access Systems Аs Medical Care Quality Indicators: Comparative Analysis of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters and Implantable Venous Port Systems

Rykov¹,

Petrash²,

Men³

2017

Oncopediatria

View full text Add to dashboard Cite

A Single Institution Experience of Seven Hundred Consecutively placed Peripherally Inserted Central Venous Catheters

Abstract: Bedside placement of PICC line by trained vascular nurses is an effective method with a high success rate, low malposition rate and requires minimal support from interventional radiology.

Cited by 24 publications

References 8 publications

Risk of Infection Using Peripherally Inserted Central and Umbilical Catheters in Preterm Neonates

Risk of Infection Using Peripherally Inserted Central and Umbilical Catheters in Preterm Neonates

Picc in the Treatment of Children With Cancer: Results of a Multicenter Study

Venous Access Systems Аs Medical Care Quality Indicators: Comparative Analysis of Peripherally Inserted Central Catheters and Implantable Venous Port Systems

Contact Info

Product

Resources

About