1998
DOI: 10.1016/s0006-8993(98)00656-8
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A single dose model of methamphetamine-induced neurotoxicity in rats: effects on neostriatal monoamines and glial fibrillary acidic protein

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1

Citation Types

5
72
1

Year Published

2002
2002
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
10

Relationship

1
9

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 100 publications
(78 citation statements)
references
References 18 publications
5
72
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Furthermore, the results of the present experiment, in which the number of C-tau immunoreactive cells has been shown to be increased in the striatum following METH or AMPH treatment, but not MDMA or PMA treatment, are in agreement with previous studies that have examined GFAP immunoreactivity or protein expression. Treatment of rodents with a METH regimen similar to that used in this study or single high-dose METH administration has been reported to produce an increase in GFAP in the striatum as measured by semiquantitative immunoblot (Fukumura et al, 1998) or immunoreactivity (Bowyer et al, 1994, Broening et al, 1997 3 days after drug treatment. Various dosing regimens of AMPH also have been reported to increase striatal GFAP immunoreactivity (Bowyer, 2000, Armstrong et al, 2004, Bowyer et al, 2004.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…Furthermore, the results of the present experiment, in which the number of C-tau immunoreactive cells has been shown to be increased in the striatum following METH or AMPH treatment, but not MDMA or PMA treatment, are in agreement with previous studies that have examined GFAP immunoreactivity or protein expression. Treatment of rodents with a METH regimen similar to that used in this study or single high-dose METH administration has been reported to produce an increase in GFAP in the striatum as measured by semiquantitative immunoblot (Fukumura et al, 1998) or immunoreactivity (Bowyer et al, 1994, Broening et al, 1997 3 days after drug treatment. Various dosing regimens of AMPH also have been reported to increase striatal GFAP immunoreactivity (Bowyer, 2000, Armstrong et al, 2004, Bowyer et al, 2004.…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 85%
“…However, both are as effective inducing deficits of DA terminal markers in the striatum of mice [42,43,44]. Both dose schedules of METH induce GFAP in striatal astrocytes [12]. However, a study suggests that this astrocytic response may be due to degenerating corticostriatal fibers since GFAP induction was observed in the absence of depletion of striatal TH [24].…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In particular, animals given repeated doses of METH develop long-lasting depletions of DA and 5-HT, their major metabolites, their membrane transporters, their rate-limiting biosynthetic enzymes, and their vesicular transporters (Gibb et al, 1994;Lew et al, 1997;Cho and Melega, 2002;McCann and Ricaurte, 2004). Anatomic studies indicate that reductions in presynaptic DA and 5-HT axonal markers are related to destruction of DA and 5-HT axon terminals (Ricaurte et al, 1982(Ricaurte et al, , 1984aSonsalla et al, 1996, Fukumura et al, 1998.…”
Section: Methamphetaminementioning
confidence: 99%