2020
DOI: 10.1007/s10072-020-04591-3
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A single-centre experience of intravenous thrombolysis for stroke in COVID-19 patients

Abstract: The sudden worldwide outbreak of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19) has certainly provided new challenges in the management of acute ischaemic stroke, and the risk-benefit ratio of intravenous thrombolysis in COVID-19 positive patients is not well known. We describe four COVID-19 patients treated with intravenous thrombolysis for acute ischaemic stroke. Although rt-PA administration is the main therapeutic strategy, our patients experienced unpredictable complications and showed atypical features: the overall… Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

1
17
0

Year Published

2020
2020
2022
2022

Publication Types

Select...
6

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 19 publications
(18 citation statements)
references
References 10 publications
1
17
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For the small number of cases of COVID-19 patients who have also suffered AIS and received reperfusion therapy, consisting of intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular thrombectomy or a combination of both, the outcomes have not been particularly positive. In a case series regarding four patients with COVID-19-related AIS who also received systemic thrombolysis, all died ( 126 ). Similarly, in COVID-19-infected stroke patients reported in a healthcare system in New York who received alteplase and mechanical thrombectomy, the neurological outcomes were also poor ( 94 ).…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…For the small number of cases of COVID-19 patients who have also suffered AIS and received reperfusion therapy, consisting of intravenous thrombolysis or endovascular thrombectomy or a combination of both, the outcomes have not been particularly positive. In a case series regarding four patients with COVID-19-related AIS who also received systemic thrombolysis, all died ( 126 ). Similarly, in COVID-19-infected stroke patients reported in a healthcare system in New York who received alteplase and mechanical thrombectomy, the neurological outcomes were also poor ( 94 ).…”
Section: Results and Analysismentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Under these circumstances, it therefore becomes essential that recommendations and guidelines on stroke care be modified as per emergency medical situations, and neurologists follow what may be aptly termed as a "protected stroke code" instead of the regularly practised stroke codes. [131][132][133][134][135] RECOMMENDATIONS FOR MANAGING STROKE DURING COVID-19 [131][132][133][134][135][136][137][138][139][140] First, apart from the regular screening methods used by paramedics before transferring the patient to appropriate centres, COVID-19 pandemic mandates the use of additional screening protocol, including that of an infection control screen and a travel history screen for all patients, based on the recommendations of WHO or CDC. 1,141,142 They must complete screening the patient for infection, assessing for features such as fever, cough, chest pain, headache, myalgia, shortness of breath and gastrointestinal symptoms like vomiting or diarrhea.…”
Section: Role Of Neurologistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Previous studies have shown that the use of rt-PA in patients with ischemic stroke and higher levels of inflammatory markers has foreseen a greater risk of ICH and poorer prognosis. [138][139][140] The presence of hepatic dysfunction may further add to the potential threat of ICH, as rt-PA is metabolised in the liver, 144 and any dysfunction will lead to decreased clearance of the drug. Apart from a detailed coagulation profile, other tools like thromboelastography go a long way in helping neurologists weigh the risks against the benefits of rt-PA administration.…”
Section: Role Of Neurologistsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The sample sizes are limited in both studies; thus, further investigation on larger cohort is required to confirm the existing findings. At the moment, it is not a rare event to treat AIS with rt-PA in COVID-19 patients (Cappellari et al 2020 ; Carneiro et al 2020 ; Co et al 2020 ; Escalard et al 2020 ; Sangalli et al 2020 ), but no sufficient evidence could confirm the efficacy of this treatment, and no clear regulation is available to prohibit the use of rt-PA just due to the abnormal laboratory indicators. Therefore, clinicians should be aware of the inherent risk of rt-PA treatment for patients with COVID-19 and stroke.…”
Section: Rapid Vascular Recanalization For Covid-19 Patients With Sudmentioning
confidence: 99%