Abstract:Background: To evaluate the early and late outcome of heart transplantation (HT) using marginal (MDs) and optimal donors (ODs). Methods: Clinical records of recipients transplanted between July 2004 and December 2014 were retrospectively reviewed. MDs were defined as follows: age >55 years, high-dose inotropic support, left ventricular ejection fraction <45%, left ventricular hypertrophy, donor to recipient predicted heart mass ratio <0.86, ischemic time >4 hours. Results: A total of 412 (55%) recipients recei… Show more
“…2 In an attempt to resolve this problem, it is urged not only to promote organ donation but also to review the common regulation for donor organ selection criteria. [3][4][5] In the context of the deregulation of donor organ selection criteria, one of the global initiatives is to extend the existing donor pool by using so-called "marginal donor hearts," that is, organs that do not meet the entire range of criteria for optimal donor conditions. As a global consensus for alleviating donor heart criteria, the following donor selection factors were proposed: age, sex, or physique mismatch; drug abuse; hepatitis C; concomitant coronary artery disease; and impaired left ventricular (LV) function.…”
Objectives The global shortage of donor organs has urged transplanting units to extend donor selection criteria, for example, impaired left ventricular function (LVF), leading to the use of marginal donor hearts. We retrospectively analyzed our patients after orthotopic heart transplantation (oHTX) with a focus on the clinical outcome depending on donor LVF.
Methods Donor reports, intraoperative, echocardiographic, and clinical follow-up data of patients undergoing oHTX at a single-center between September 2010 and June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Recipients were divided into two groups based on donor left ventricular ejection fraction (dLVEF): impaired dLVEF (group I; dLVEF ≤ 50%; n = 23) and normal dLVEF group (group N; dLVEF > 50%; n = 137).
Results There was no difference in 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year survival. However, the duration of in-hospital stay was statistically longer in group I than in group N (N: 40.9 ± 28.3 days vs. I: 55.9 ± 39.4 days, p < 0.05). Furthermore, postoperative infection events were significantly more frequent in group I (p = 0.03), which was also supported by multivariate analysis (p = 0.03; odds ratio: 2.96; confidence interval: 1.12–7.83). Upon correlation analysis, dLVEF and recipient LVEF prove as statistically independent (r = 0.12, p = 0.17).
Conclusions Impaired dLVEF is associated with prolonged posttransplant recovery and slightly increased morbidity but has no significant impact on survival up to 1 year posttransplant.
“…2 In an attempt to resolve this problem, it is urged not only to promote organ donation but also to review the common regulation for donor organ selection criteria. [3][4][5] In the context of the deregulation of donor organ selection criteria, one of the global initiatives is to extend the existing donor pool by using so-called "marginal donor hearts," that is, organs that do not meet the entire range of criteria for optimal donor conditions. As a global consensus for alleviating donor heart criteria, the following donor selection factors were proposed: age, sex, or physique mismatch; drug abuse; hepatitis C; concomitant coronary artery disease; and impaired left ventricular (LV) function.…”
Objectives The global shortage of donor organs has urged transplanting units to extend donor selection criteria, for example, impaired left ventricular function (LVF), leading to the use of marginal donor hearts. We retrospectively analyzed our patients after orthotopic heart transplantation (oHTX) with a focus on the clinical outcome depending on donor LVF.
Methods Donor reports, intraoperative, echocardiographic, and clinical follow-up data of patients undergoing oHTX at a single-center between September 2010 and June 2020 were retrospectively analyzed. Recipients were divided into two groups based on donor left ventricular ejection fraction (dLVEF): impaired dLVEF (group I; dLVEF ≤ 50%; n = 23) and normal dLVEF group (group N; dLVEF > 50%; n = 137).
Results There was no difference in 30-day, 90-day, and 1-year survival. However, the duration of in-hospital stay was statistically longer in group I than in group N (N: 40.9 ± 28.3 days vs. I: 55.9 ± 39.4 days, p < 0.05). Furthermore, postoperative infection events were significantly more frequent in group I (p = 0.03), which was also supported by multivariate analysis (p = 0.03; odds ratio: 2.96; confidence interval: 1.12–7.83). Upon correlation analysis, dLVEF and recipient LVEF prove as statistically independent (r = 0.12, p = 0.17).
Conclusions Impaired dLVEF is associated with prolonged posttransplant recovery and slightly increased morbidity but has no significant impact on survival up to 1 year posttransplant.
“…Though we found that the use of a marginal donor was independently associated with post‐OHT mortality, prior studies have demonstrated relatively favorable outcomes with these donors 10,11 . Donor age in particular has been a focus of study.…”
Background
This study explored trends in utilization of marginal donors for orthotopic heart transplantation (OHT) in the United States.
Methods
Using the United Network for Organ Sharing database, adults (≥18 years) undergoing OHT between 2009 and 2019 were identified. Marginal donors were defined as having ≥2 of the following: age ≥50 years, ejection fraction less than 50%, ischemic time greater than 240 min, donor‐to‐recipient body mass index ratio less than 0.8, or donor inotrope use. Kaplan–Meier analysis was utilized to model survival with multivariable Cox regression analysis used for risk‐adjustment.
Results
A total of 23,580 recipients underwent OHT with 4896 (20.76%) receiving organs from marginal donors. The use of marginal donors decreased from 25.6% in 2009 to 16.0% in 2017 but accounted for 24.7% of OHTs in 2019. This recent increase in marginal donor use was largely attributable to increased use of donors with ischemic time greater than 240 min, whereas other marginal donor criteria remained stable. Among 140 centers, median marginal donor use was 20.07% (interquartile range, 14.17%–26.51%). An increasing proportion of marginal donors was not associated with increased center‐level OHT volume (R2 < 0.001, p = .833). Marginal donor use was associated with reduced 1‐ (88.75% vs. 91.87%) and 5‐year survival (76.73% vs. 80.08%, p < .001). Following adjustment, marginal donor use remained a significant predictor of post‐OHT mortality (hazard ratio, 1.17; p < .001).
Conclusion
Marginal donors account for approximately 20% of OHTs performed in the United States. Despite a reduction in utilization over the past decade, the 2018 allocation change has resulted in a significant increase in use, largely attributable to longer ischemic times.
scite is a Brooklyn-based organization that helps researchers better discover and understand research articles through Smart Citations–citations that display the context of the citation and describe whether the article provides supporting or contrasting evidence. scite is used by students and researchers from around the world and is funded in part by the National Science Foundation and the National Institute on Drug Abuse of the National Institutes of Health.