2021
DOI: 10.1101/2021.03.02.433590
|View full text |Cite
Preprint
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A single-cell atlas of breast cancer cell lines to study tumour heterogeneity and drug response

Abstract: Brest Cancer (BC) patient stratification is mainly driven by receptor status and histological grading and subtyping, with about twenty percent of patients for which absence of any actionable biomarkers results in no clear therapeutic intervention to apply. Here, we evaluated the potentiality of single-cell transcriptomics for automated diagnosis and drug treatment of breast cancer. We transcriptionally profiled 35,276 individual cells from 33 BC cell-lines covering all main BC subtypes to yield a Breast Cancer… Show more

Help me understand this report
View published versions

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1

Citation Types

0
2
0

Year Published

2021
2021
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
1
1

Relationship

0
2

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 2 publications
(2 citation statements)
references
References 77 publications
0
2
0
Order By: Relevance
“…Classification of luminal subtypes as ER-positive and that of HER2+ and basal-like as ER-negative is endorsed by recent transcriptomic profiling of 35 276 cells from 32 breast cancer cell lines capturing the percentage of cells positive for expression of ESR1 and various EMT players in cell lines representing different breast cancer subtypes. While luminal cell lines such as MCF7, BT474 and T47D have higher percentage of cells that are positive for ESR1 and the ones negative for SLUG and ZEB1, HER2+ and triple negative cell lines such as MDA-MB-453, BT549 and MDA-MB-468 showed a reverse trend ( 52 ). Put together, this analysis supports our prediction about an association between activation of EMT program and compromised ERα signaling activity in ER-positive breast cancer cases, supported both by bulk and single-cell data analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Classification of luminal subtypes as ER-positive and that of HER2+ and basal-like as ER-negative is endorsed by recent transcriptomic profiling of 35 276 cells from 32 breast cancer cell lines capturing the percentage of cells positive for expression of ESR1 and various EMT players in cell lines representing different breast cancer subtypes. While luminal cell lines such as MCF7, BT474 and T47D have higher percentage of cells that are positive for ESR1 and the ones negative for SLUG and ZEB1, HER2+ and triple negative cell lines such as MDA-MB-453, BT549 and MDA-MB-468 showed a reverse trend ( 52 ). Put together, this analysis supports our prediction about an association between activation of EMT program and compromised ERα signaling activity in ER-positive breast cancer cases, supported both by bulk and single-cell data analysis.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Intratumor heterogeneity has become a key factor in the failure of cancer treatments, arising from a variety of factors, including the genetic diversity of cells and numerous distinct cell subpopulations within a tumor [2,3].This diversity poses substantial challenges in predicting responses to personalized anti-cancer treatments [4]. In this context, single-cell RNA sequencing (scRNA-seq) analysis has emerged as a powerful tool, providing novel insights into the cellular composition of tumors [5] and enabling the identification of distinct cellular subpopulations that contribute to resistance [6,7]. The analysis of scRNA-seq holds great promise for enhancing drug response prediction, tailoring therapies to individual patients, and facilitating personalized oncology [8].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%