2000
DOI: 10.3892/or.7.2.249
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simultaneous monitoring of Lens culinaris agglutinin A-reactive alpha-fetoprotein and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin as an early diagnosis of hepatocellular carcinoma in the follow-up of cirrhotic patients.

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
39
0

Year Published

2000
2000
2017
2017

Publication Types

Select...
8

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 40 publications
(39 citation statements)
references
References 0 publications
0
39
0
Order By: Relevance
“…1, Table 1) [68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84]. Eleven studies included data on more than one tumor marker [70, 71, 73-77, 79-81, 83], and 4 of them provided sensitivity and specificity of a combination of two tumor markers [70,74,77,79]. As 8 studies provided sensitivity and specificity with more than one cutoff value [68, 70, Test for heterogeneity 4 mAU/ml chi-square = 5.44; df = 1; P = 0.20 40 mAU/ml chi-square = 2.58; df = 4; P =0.63 100 mAU/ml chi-square = 10.14; df = 6; P = 0.12 combined chi-square = 41.29; df = 15; P = 0.0003 Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…1, Table 1) [68][69][70][71][72][73][74][75][76][77][78][79][80][81][82][83][84]. Eleven studies included data on more than one tumor marker [70, 71, 73-77, 79-81, 83], and 4 of them provided sensitivity and specificity of a combination of two tumor markers [70,74,77,79]. As 8 studies provided sensitivity and specificity with more than one cutoff value [68, 70, Test for heterogeneity 4 mAU/ml chi-square = 5.44; df = 1; P = 0.20 40 mAU/ml chi-square = 2.58; df = 4; P =0.63 100 mAU/ml chi-square = 10.14; df = 6; P = 0.12 combined chi-square = 41.29; df = 15; P = 0.0003 Table 2.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…AFP-L3 and DCP showed higher diagnostic accuracy than AFP (Table 4). We also plotted the combined sensitivity and specificity of AFP + DCP, AFP-L3 + DCP, and AFP + AFP-L3 provided in four studies [70,74,77,79].…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Sassa et al [27] reported that it was 44.3% for ≤ 2 cm. An assay that employs higher DCP diagnostic sensitivity has been introduced [25,26] , but the diagnostic sensitivity for small hepatocellular carcinoma still remains at about 50% [27][28][29][30] . Thus, most reports on biological properties of DCP positive hepatic carcinoma are based on more advanced diseases [7] .…”
Section: Discussionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…However, the rate of detectable serum DCP levels in patients with small hepatocellular carcinoma is low [19][20][21][22][23][24] . Although methods have been improved [25,26] , sensitivity is still at about 50% for most small cell carcinoma [27][28][29][30] . Thus, almost all reports on the biological nature of DCP and its prognostic value are based on analyses of patients with larger or more advanced tumors with various degrees of hepatic functional reserve.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…45 Several prospective cohort studies of patients with cirrhosis but without HCC have been performed to determine the performance of DCP. [46][47][48][49] The sensitivities for detecting HCC ranged from 23% to 57% for DCP compared to 14% to 71% for AFP. In the largest study with DCP, 734 patients with cirrhosis were followed for a mean of 13 months (range, 7-17), during which HCC was detected in 29 patients.…”
Section: S C R E E N I N G F O R H E P a T O C E L L U L A R C A R C mentioning
confidence: 99%