1999
DOI: 10.1016/s0965-8564(98)00036-6
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simulation study of truck passenger car equivalents (PCE) on basic freeway sections

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
52
1
1

Year Published

2012
2012
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
3

Relationship

0
8

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 106 publications
(54 citation statements)
references
References 2 publications
0
52
1
1
Order By: Relevance
“…Today, the definition remains essentially the same in HCM 2010as "the number of passenger cars that will result in the same operational conditions as a single heavy vehicle of a particular type under specified roadway, traffic, and control conditions" [4]. Simply put, the passenger car equivalent of a vehicle represents the number of passenger cars that would have an equivalent effect on the quality of the traffic flow under prevailing conditions [5]. In some countries, the heterogeneous nature of local traffic has led to the expansion of the scope of PCEs to include even non-motorized vehiclessuch as rickshaws, bullock carts, and handcarts [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 1 more Smart Citation
“…Today, the definition remains essentially the same in HCM 2010as "the number of passenger cars that will result in the same operational conditions as a single heavy vehicle of a particular type under specified roadway, traffic, and control conditions" [4]. Simply put, the passenger car equivalent of a vehicle represents the number of passenger cars that would have an equivalent effect on the quality of the traffic flow under prevailing conditions [5]. In some countries, the heterogeneous nature of local traffic has led to the expansion of the scope of PCEs to include even non-motorized vehiclessuch as rickshaws, bullock carts, and handcarts [6].…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Nevertheless, almost all PCE evaluation techniques tend to be based on one type of traffic flow variable or another. While most PCE estimation approaches use headways [1,[8][9][10], others are based on speeds [11], delay [12][13][14], density [5,15], travel time [16] and even platoon formation [11]. Whichever approach is used, the outcome shouldreflect prevailing local conditions and the character of local traffic.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The criteria used are delay [14], speed [15,16], density [17,18], headway [19] and queue discharge flow [20]. Truly speaking, the basis for PCU estimation should be the same as used for defining the level of service (LOS) for a roadway type.…”
Section: Estimation Of Pcu Factorsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Elefteriadou et al, 1997), (iii) density (e.g. Webster and Elefteriadou, 1999), (iv) headway (e.g. Krammes and Crowley, 1986) and (v) queue discharge (e.g.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…There was great variability in PCE values as a function of the weight/ horsepower ratio as well as of vehicle length. Webster and Elefteriadou (1999) also studied the effect of eight highway traffic variables on truck passenger car equivalency (PCE), based on traffic density, using simulation technique. The following inferences were made through the study: PCE value tends to increase with traffic flow, free flow speed, and grade/length of grade; and PCE value tends to decrease with an increase in truck percentage and number of lanes.…”
Section: Literature Reviewmentioning
confidence: 99%