2007
DOI: 10.1016/j.desal.2006.04.048
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simulation study of the removal efficiency of granular activated carbon on cadmium and lead

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
4
1

Citation Types

0
76
1
3

Year Published

2009
2009
2019
2019

Publication Types

Select...
5
5

Relationship

0
10

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 170 publications
(80 citation statements)
references
References 9 publications
0
76
1
3
Order By: Relevance
“…The most widely used methods to remove heavy metals are chemical or electrochemical precipitation (Lai and Sheng, 2003;Mahvi, 2008). Adsorption process using activated carbon, widely used as an adsorbent, is among the most effective techniques for heavy metals removal from waste streams (Jusoh et al, 2007). In the last decades, there have been a great trend for using of low cost absorbents and different studies have demonstrated that natural agents have high removal capacity for divalent heavy metal ions (Ayyappana et al, 2005;Carrillo-Morales et al, 2001;Corami et al, 2008;Inglezakis et al, 2007;Naseem and Tahir, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The most widely used methods to remove heavy metals are chemical or electrochemical precipitation (Lai and Sheng, 2003;Mahvi, 2008). Adsorption process using activated carbon, widely used as an adsorbent, is among the most effective techniques for heavy metals removal from waste streams (Jusoh et al, 2007). In the last decades, there have been a great trend for using of low cost absorbents and different studies have demonstrated that natural agents have high removal capacity for divalent heavy metal ions (Ayyappana et al, 2005;Carrillo-Morales et al, 2001;Corami et al, 2008;Inglezakis et al, 2007;Naseem and Tahir, 2001).…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Various improved and innovative methods such as reverse osmosis, precipitation, coagulation, ion exchange, solvent extraction, adsorption, membrane filtration, ultra-filtration and photoreduction have been developed to remove metal pollutants from contaminated water and wastewater (Bailey et al 1999;Barron-Zambrano et al 2002;Chen and Wang 2000;Hunsom et al 2005;Kentish and Stevens 2001;Pacheco et al 2006). Among the above-mentioned processes, adsorption plays a pivotal role in removing metals from the aqueous phase using various biomaterial sorbents, algae (Holan et al 1993), fungi, sugar cane bagasse (Cerino Córdova et al 2011;Peterlene et al 1999), rice husk, wheat barn (Nouri et al 2007), pine bark, olive cake (Doyurum and Celik 2006), coconut husk, chitin (Benguella and Benaissa 2002), ash, activated carbon (Jusoh et al 2007;Onundi et al 2011;Zavvar Mousavi and Seyedi 2011), etc. Clays, zeolite, calcite, manganese nodule residue (Agrawal and Sahu 2006;Tashauoei et al 2010), perlite (Hasan et al 2006) and peat (Gabaldon et al 2006) have also been employed to remove metals from the water phase.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…The latter is one of the most effective and economical techniques used to remove heavy metals 7 . Different adsorbents have been employed in the process of adsorption: activated charcoal 8 , kaolinite 9 , natural and synthetic zeolites 10 , rice husks 11 , clays 12 , among others. Clays have properties such as high cation exchange capacity, they are easily available and low cost adsorbents, which can be recycled and reused for subsequent cycles.…”
Section: Introductionmentioning
confidence: 99%