2008 IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record 2008
DOI: 10.1109/nssmic.2008.4774363
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A simulation study of a long axial field of view whole-body PET scanner using cylindrical and anthropomorphic phantoms

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
2
2
1

Citation Types

0
15
0

Year Published

2009
2009
2024
2024

Publication Types

Select...
5
1

Relationship

0
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 8 publications
(15 citation statements)
references
References 21 publications
0
15
0
Order By: Relevance
“…For comparing to a previous cylinder-SimSET simulation study of a 2-meter-AFOV tomograph [5], we have summarized comparable results in Table 2 for a 54-block (2.136 meters) AFOV scanner that was part of our parametric-design study. In addition to mismatched AFOV, we expect differences in these two simulations to result from model differences in scanner geometry, patient-bed representation, phantom geometry (length and diameter), and singles LLD (Poon et al used 50 keV and we used 85 keV).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 3 more Smart Citations
“…For comparing to a previous cylinder-SimSET simulation study of a 2-meter-AFOV tomograph [5], we have summarized comparable results in Table 2 for a 54-block (2.136 meters) AFOV scanner that was part of our parametric-design study. In addition to mismatched AFOV, we expect differences in these two simulations to result from model differences in scanner geometry, patient-bed representation, phantom geometry (length and diameter), and singles LLD (Poon et al used 50 keV and we used 85 keV).…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…In addition to mismatched AFOV, we expect differences in these two simulations to result from model differences in scanner geometry, patient-bed representation, phantom geometry (length and diameter), and singles LLD (Poon et al used 50 keV and we used 85 keV). The effect of some model differences (block detector and patient bed representation) on resulting count rates are diminished by count-rate correction factors applied by Poon et al [5]. With such large differences in tomograph and phantom models it is difficult to make a meaningful comparison.…”
Section: Resultsmentioning
confidence: 99%
See 2 more Smart Citations
“…In a recent study, Poon et al [17] developed a detailed simulation, based on anthropomorphic phantoms, of LSO tomographs up to 2 m long. With very fast electronics (several hundred MHz) a 2 m-long system should be able to increase sensitivity by a factor of 25-50, compared with the "reference" GE Discovery STE system.…”
Section: But Can We Now Do Without the Benefits Of Tof?mentioning
confidence: 99%