A Simulation Platform for Quantifying Survival Bias: An Application to Research on Determinants of Cognitive Decline

Abstract

Bias due to selective mortality is a potential concern in many studies and is especially relevant in cognitive aging research because cognitive impairment strongly predicts subsequent mortality. Biased estimation of the effect of an exposure on rate of cognitive decline can occur when mortality is a common effect of exposure and an unmeasured determinant of cognitive decline and in similar settings. This potential is often represented as collider-stratification bias in directed acyclic graphs, but it is difficult to anticipate the magnitude of bias. In this paper, we present a flexible simulation platform with which to quantify the expected bias in longitudinal studies of determinants of cognitive decline. We evaluated potential survival bias in naive analyses under several selective survival scenarios, assuming that exposure had no effect on cognitive decline for anyone in the population. Compared with the situation with no collider bias, the magnitude of bias was higher when exposure and an unmeasured determinant of cognitive decline interacted on the hazard ratio scale to influence mortality or when both exposure and rate of cognitive decline influenced mortality. Bias was, as expected, larger in high-mortality situations. This simulation platform provides a flexible tool for evaluating biases in studies with high mortality, as is common in cognitive aging research.

The Obesity Paradox in Survival after Cancer Diagnosis: Tools for Evaluation of Potential Bias

“…The plausibility of these scenarios must depend on researchers’ judgement about these unknowns, but simulation models can provide a basis for such evaluations. (7, 11) Simulations allow us to say: given what we know about each type of cancer, is it plausible that overweight or obesity might appear harmless or protective when they are actually harmful for post-diagnosis survival?…”

Association of a Genetic Risk Score With Body Mass Index

“…Although this type of survival bias is plausible, it is small unless the factors have extremely strong and interactive effects on survival. 4,5 Assessing the Patient With Arthralgia, Fevers, and Rash…”

“…Although this type of survival bias is plausible, it is small unless the factors have extremely strong and interactive effects on survival. 4 Both scenarios imply that the average GRS-BMI should be lower for study participants in earlier birth cohorts. However, we showed (Table 2 in the article and eTable 1 in the Supplement) that genetic risk remained stable across the birth cohorts, despite major changes in BMI.…”

Alzheimer's disease genetic risk variants beyond APOE ε4 predict mortality

“…APOE has also been implicated in risk for other disease processes including cardiovascular disease [10], so it may influence mortality via mechanism(s) other than dementia, thereby introducing potential survivor bias in its relationship with LOAD. By assessing whether non- APOE genes associated with LOAD are also associated with increased mortality, we can provide researchers with tools to systematically evaluate the potential magnitude of survivor bias [11].…”