2000
DOI: 10.1111/1467-9884.00240
|View full text |Cite
|
Sign up to set email alerts
|

A Simulation Comparison of Several Procedures for Testing the Poisson Assumption

Abstract: Summary. The importance of the Poisson distribution among the discrete distributions has led to the development of several hypothesis tests, for testing whether data come from a Poisson distribution against a variety of alternative distributions. An extended simulation comparison is presented concerning the power of such tests. To overcome biases caused by the use of asymptotic results for the null distribution of several tests, an extended simulation was performed for calculating the required critical points … Show more

Help me understand this report

Search citation statements

Order By: Relevance

Paper Sections

Select...
1
1
1
1

Citation Types

0
16
0
5

Year Published

2003
2003
2013
2013

Publication Types

Select...
7

Relationship

1
6

Authors

Journals

citations
Cited by 38 publications
(21 citation statements)
references
References 75 publications
(77 reference statements)
0
16
0
5
Order By: Relevance
“…Because of sampling variability associated with a finite sample, we want to test whether the dispersion coefficient is statistically different from 1. To accomplish this task we use a Monte Carlo approach (e.g., see Karlis and Xekalaki [2000] for an overview on tests for the Poisson distribution). For each station, we generate B = 5000 synthetic series drawn from a Poisson distribution with the same mean and the same length of the record of interest.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…Because of sampling variability associated with a finite sample, we want to test whether the dispersion coefficient is statistically different from 1. To accomplish this task we use a Monte Carlo approach (e.g., see Karlis and Xekalaki [2000] for an overview on tests for the Poisson distribution). For each station, we generate B = 5000 synthetic series drawn from a Poisson distribution with the same mean and the same length of the record of interest.…”
Section: Methodsmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…A coefficient of dispersion different from 1 does not, however, necessarily mean that the assumption of Poisson distribution is not valid because of the sampling uncertainties associated with estimates of the mean and variance from a finite sample. To test whether the empirical coefficient of dispersion is statistically significantly different from 1, a Monte-Carlo approach is used (Karlis and Xekalaki, 2000 for an overview on tests for the Poisson distribution). For each station, B = 5000 synthetic series are generated from a Poisson distribution with the same mean and record length, and B coefficients of dispersion are computed.…”
Section: Poisson Regression Modelmentioning
confidence: 99%
“…To test for this possibility before exploring more complicated causes of community composition we performed an index of dispersion test on all plant and AMF species used in the study. For a dataset x with n elements, this statistic is (n ¡ 1) £ var(x)/ mean(x) and its asymptotic distribution is 2 with n ¡ 1 df (Karlis and Xekalaki 2000;PotthoV and Whitting 1966). A P-value is obtained by determining the cumulative density of the 2 (n ¡ 1) distribution to the right of the test statistic, and represents the probability that the observed variance arose by chance from a Poisson distribution.…”
Section: Statisticsmentioning
confidence: 99%